Jovanka Krunić, an associate at the Special State Prosecutor’s Office who was in charge of financial investigations, told the High Court that former Chief Special Prosecutor Milivoje Katnić had never asked her to alter a document or conceal anything for any member of the „Kavač“ or „Škaljari“ criminal clans. As she stated, she only received positive guidance, and Katnić was involved in the most complex investigations.
In her testimony at the trial of Katnić, former senior police official Zoran Lazović, and suspended prosecutor Saša Čađenović, Krunić also said that in a single year more than 200 individuals from criminal clans had been checked.
- More than 90 individuals from the „Kavač“ clan and over 80 from the „Škaljari“ clan were prosecuted - Krunić said. She added that she worked on almost all of those cases with prosecutor Saša Čađenović.
Krunić further explained that prior to 2022, while Katnić was serving as Chief Special Prosecutor, she received operational information that Ljubo Milović was planning to purchase a bank in Montenegro or to act as an intermediary in such a purchase.
- I am not certain whether he was purchasing the bank or mediating the transaction. We were supposed to monitor whether a sale would take place, but it was never realized. I believe Ukrainian nationals were also involved - Krunić said.
She stated that she was not sure whether she received this information from Katnić, from the head of the Special Police Department Dragan Radonjić, or from Čađenović.
Before the judicial panel presided over by Judge Veljko Radovanović, Krunić said that during her questioning at the SSPO she had been presented with a document related to Ljubo Milović, which had been created under her account under the title „Milovići“.
- That document was created in September 2022, and the most logical conclusion is that the order came from Special Prosecutor Zoran Vučinić - Krunić explained.
Vučinić instructed her to check a financial transaction exceeding 40 million euros, and according to the witness, she was tasked with obtaining information on whether the transaction had been carried out.
In response to Katnić’s question, she said they were unable to locate the funds, but they did receive guidance on where the money might have originated.
She said she does not know the outcome of those checks, as her colleagues continued working on the case while she was assigned to other matters.
Krunić explained that she conducted the checks based on information from publicly available sources.
- These data served as signposts for further searches and verifications - the witness emphasized.
Prosecutor Miloš Šoškić requested that the judicial panel prohibit Katnić from asking questions related to details of the Ljubo Milović case, as the matter is still active and such questioning could jeopardize the investigation.
Šoškić believes that Krunić’s testimony refuted Katnić’s defense that he had worked on the Milović case, as that case was not opened until July 19, 2022, and that „10, 15, or 20 million euros were deposited into Milović’s account“.
Katnić, on the other hand, pointed out that on May 11, 2024, the „Vijesti“ news portal published all data regarding payments that Ukrainians were supposed to transfer via Germany to Ljubo Milović’s account.
- So much for secrecy - Katnić said. He was categorical in stating that his defense had not been refuted, but that he simply could not recall the exact amount of money with precision.
Čađenović also pointed out that he had not been present during the witness’s questioning at the SSPO.
He emphasized that because Krunić worked on the largest number of cases with him, she left open the possibility that she might have received the information about the bank purchase from him. Krunić stated that she was not certain whether she received the operational information from him, Radonjić, or Katnić.
- She did not receive any information about Ljubo Milović from me - Čađenović said.
He stressed that it is undisputed that from 2016 to 2022 a significantly larger number of individuals from the „Kavač“ criminal clan were prosecuted, and that he worked on those cases.
At today’s hearing, Milan Mrvaljević was also heard as a witness. He said that he has been a long-time friend of the Katnić family.
While construction work was being carried out on properties in Barjamovica, a man employed by him delivered stone and soil because he had surplus materials, but he did not do this only for the Katnić family, but also for many people he wanted to help.
- As far as those properties in Barjamovica are concerned, I did not examine the paperwork, but I was told that they are the property of the Katnić family - Mrvaljević testified.
Katnić said that Mrvaljević had spoken truthfully and sincerely, as befits an honest man.
He pointed out that the properties are owned by himself, his two brothers, and his nephew.
The trial will continue on February 10, when former head of the Department for the Fight against Organized Crime Milorad Žižić is scheduled to testify.

Marija Žižić

original

viewImage

baseImage

610x380

500x500

400x240

400x203

1250x600

1084x550

thumbnail

Krunić: We checked information on whether Milović planned to buy a bank, Katnić never asked me to alter any document

The Police Directorate has issued a warrant for the former Special State Prosecutor Lidija Mitrović, who, according to police officials, failed to report voluntarily to serve her prison sentence.
Mitrović had previously submitted a request to the court to postpone the execution of her prison sentence, which, according to police information, was not approved.
- Officers of the Podgorica Security Department, acting on the order of the Basic Court in Podgorica for the forced bringing in of the convicted Lidija Mitrović, who failed to report voluntarily to serve her prison sentence, visited her registered residence and places of stay on several occasions. She was not found at any of those locations, and members of her family provided conflicting information regarding her whereabouts within the territory of Podgorica or Budva - the police said in a statement.
The Police Directorate claims that officers visited all listed addresses where Mitrović was not located, and that the competent court was informed accordingly.
- Taking into account that Mitrović did not report voluntarily to serve her prison sentence, but instead is avoiding it, as we have stated, officers of the Police Directorate informed the competent court of all established facts, based on which a warrant was issued for this person with the aim of locating her and bringing her in to serve her prison sentence - the police statement reads.
They added that further activities aimed at locating Mitrović are ongoing.
- We will also activate other legally permitted mechanisms in order to ensure that the convicted person is brought in to serve the prison sentence - the Police Directorate said.
Mitrović requested a postponement of serving the seven-month prison sentence to which she was convicted for abuse of office in the „Klap“ case.
The High Court in Podgorica had previously found Mitrović guilty for dismissing criminal complaints for tax evasion against four individuals and one legal entity after the defendants had paid their outstanding tax liabilities.
Although the verdict is final, Mitrović has not yet begun serving her sentence. The Basic Court in Podgorica confirmed that her request for postponement was rejected on October 24, after which she filed an appeal, which was decided by the High court.
The prison sentence was imposed at the end of 2024 in a retrial, after the Court of Appeal overturned the initial decision and returned the case for a new trial. In May 2025, the second-instance court upheld the new verdict.
The law provides for the possibility of postponing a prison sentence in special circumstances, such as serious illness, a death in the family, or completion of education.
During the proceedings, Mitrović claimed that the complaints she dismissed contained no elements of a criminal offense, while the High Court and the Court of Appeal concluded that, as a public official, she unlawfully abused her position and applied the deferral of criminal prosecution even though she knew that this legal mechanism could not be used in cases of tax evasion.

Portal ETV

Police is searching for Lidija Mitrović: She is evading serving a prison sentence

Saradnica u Specijalnom državnom tužilaštvu Jovanka Krunić koja je bila zadužena za finansijske istrage kazala je u Višem sudu da bivši glavni specijalni tužilac Milivoje Katnić nikada nije od nje tražio da se za neku osobu iz kavačkog ili škaljarskog klana izmijeni dokument ili da nešto sakrije. Samo je, kako je istakla, dobijala pozitivne sugestije i Katnić je bio uključen u najsloženije istrage.
Krunić je u svjedočkom iskazu na suđenju Katniću, nekadašnjem visokom policijskom funkcioneru Zoranu Lazoviću i suspendovanom tužiocu Saši Čađenoviću saopštila i da je samo u toku jedne godine provjeravano više od 200 osoba iz kriminalnih klanova.
- Više od 90 osoba je procesuirano iz kavačkog klana a preko 80 iz škaljarskog klana - kazala je Krunić. Ona je dodala da je skoro sve te predmete radila sa tužiocem Sašom Čađenovićem.
Krunić je objasnila i da je prije 2022. godine za vrijeme dok je Katnić bio glavni specijalni tužilac dobila operativni podatak da Ljubo Milović planira da kupi banku u Crnoj Gori ili da posreduje u kupovini.
- Da li je kupovao ili posredovao nijesam sigurna. Trebalo je da propratimo da li će doći do kupoprodaje ali do realizacije nije došlo. Mislim i da su uključeni bili i ukrajinski državljani - kazala je Krunić.
Ona je saopštila da nije sigurna od koga je dobila taj podatak da li od Katnića, šefa SPO Dragana Radonjića ili od Čađenovića.
Ona je pred sudskim vijećem sudije Veljka Radovanovića saopštila da joj je na saslušanju u SDT-u bilo predočen dokument za Ljuba Milovića koji je bio kreiran na njenom računu pod nazivom "Milovići".
-Taj dokument je kreiran u septembru 2022. godine i najlogičnije je da je nalog dobila od specijalnog tužioca Zorana Vučinića - objasnila je Krunić.
Vučinić joj je dao nalog da provjeri novčanu transakciju, koja bila više od 40 miliona eura i, prema riječima svjedokinje, traženo je da dođe do podatka o realizaciji transakcije.
Ona je na pitanje Katnića saopštila da nijesu uspjelj da nađu novčana sredstva, ali su dobili smjernice odakle mogu da potiču.
Epilog tih provjera, kako kaže, ne zna jer su njene kolege nastavile da rade na tom slučaju a njoj su dodijeljeni drugi predmeti.
Krunić je objasnila da je provjere radila na osnovu podataka iz javno dostupnih izvora.
- Ti podaci predstavljali su putokaz za dalje pretrage i provjere - istakla je svjedokinja.
Tužilac Miloš Šoškić je zatražio od sudskog vijeća da zabrani pitanja Katniću u vezi detalja iz predmeta za Ljuba Milovića jer je taj slučaj još aktivan, a kako ne bi bila narušena istraga.
Šoškić smatra da je iskazom svjedokinje Krunić opovrgnuta odbrana Katnića da je radio na predmetu Milovića jer taj predmet nije bio otvoren do 19. jula 2022. godine i da je "Miloviću leglo 10,15 do 20 miliona eura".
Katnić je, sa druge strane, &nbsp;ukazao da su 11.maja 2024. godine na portalu Vijesti iznijeti svi podaci o uplatama koji su Ukrajnci trebali da uplate preko Njemačke na račun Ljuba Milovića.
- Toliko o tajnosti - kazao je Katnić. &nbsp;Kategoričan je bio da njegova odbrana nije opovrgnuta, već da se nije mogao sa preciznošću sjetiti iznosa novca.
Takođe, Čađenović je ukazao da nije prisustvovao saslušanju svjedokinje u SDT -u.
On je istakao da je Krunić, zbog toga što je najviše predmeta radila sa njim, ostavila mogućnost da je možda od njega dobila informaciju o kupovini banke. Ona je kazala sa nije sigurna da li je taj operativni podatak dobila od njega, Radonjića ili Katnića.
-Od mene za Ljuba Milovića nije dobila nijedan podatak - kazao je Čađenović.
Istakao je da je nesporno od 2016. do 2022. godine mnogo više procesuiranih osoba iz kavačkog kriminalnog klana i te predmete je on radio.
Na današnjem suđenju saslušan je i Milan Mrvaljević koji je ispričao da je dugogodišnji prijatelj sa porodicom Katnić.
Kada su radili objekte u Barjamovici čovjek koji je zaposlen kod njega dovezao im je kamen i zemlju jer je imao višak toga, ali nije samo to uradio za porodicu Katnić nego za dosta ljudi kojima je želio da pomogne.
- Što se tiče tih objekata u Barjamovici nijesam gledao papire ali su mi pričali da je to imovina porodice Katnić - kazao je svjedok Mrvaljević.
Katnić je rekao da je Mrvaljević govorio istinito i iskreno kao što priliči poštenom čovjeku.
Istakao je da su ti objekti u vlasništvu njegovom, njegova dva brata i sinovca.
Suđenje se nastavlja 10. februara kada će svjedočiti bivši načelnik Odsjeka za borbu protiv organizovanog kriminala Milorad Žižić.

KRUNIĆ: Provjeravali smo podatak da li Milović planira da kupi banku, Katnić nikada nije tražio da izmijenim neki dokument

The entry of Serbian nationals Veljko Belivuk and Marko Miljković was an operational activity, and the lifting of the measure was justified given that three criminal offenses were prevented at the time. Had I been the one handling that case, I would have acted in exactly the same way. Former official Zoran Lazović never asked me to grant privileges to anyone. I never heard, nor did I have any operational knowledge, that Zoran Lazović and his son Petar had any links to criminal activities - former Acting Director of the Police Directorate Vesko Damjanović stated before the High Court.
He testified today at the trial of former senior police official Zoran Lazović, former Chief Special Prosecutor Milivoje Katnić and suspended prosecutor Saša Čađenović, whom the Special State Prosecutor’s Office (SDT) charges with subordinating their official positions to the „Kavač“ criminal clan, allegations they have denied in their defenses.
- Veljko Belivuk and Marko Miljković were persons of security interest, associated with the Grobari supporters’ group and also believed to cooperate with the „Kavač“ criminal clan. When they entered Montenegro in January 2021, we had no information about Ritopek, nor that they had illegally entered Montenegro six months earlier and committed criminal offenses - Damjanović said.
Regarding the entry of Miljković and Belivuk, he explained that he was informed by the head of the Herceg Novi Security Center or by one of the officers from Tivat.
Damjanović then, as he said, contacted the then Assistant Director of the Police Directorate Enis Baković, who informed him that the Boka Security Branch was undertaking certain activities.
- Zoran Lazović came to me and informed me in detail about the activities underway. They had information that a liquidation of Belivuk and Miljković was being planned, the second activity was aimed at preventing the murder of Slobodan Kašćelan, and the third at preventing the liquidation of Marko Ljubiša Kan in Budva - Damjanović said.
At that point, he stated, he told Lazović that Miljković and Belivuk should be kept under 24-hour surveillance to prevent them from being killed.
In response to a question from one of Lazović’s defense attorneys Zoran Piperović, the witness said that members of several organizational units participated in the Belivuk-Miljković operation.
- I believe that officers of the Criminal Police Sector, headed by Enis Baković, also participated in the operational activities related to the Belivuk and Miljković operation - Damjanović said while answering attorney Piperović’s question.
According to the witness, Baković should have known that his officers were involved in surveillance activities.
Damjanović reiterated that he had no information that Zoran or Petar Lazović had any involvement with organized criminal groups, including Radoje Zvicer, whom police identify as one of the leaders of the „Kavač“ criminal group.
The witness made this statement after attorney Piperović presented excerpts from the indictment.
In response to a question from attorney Nikola Martinović, Damjanović was categorical that there was no rulebook governing the placing of individuals under operational measures.
- As we placed them under measures, so we removed them - Damjanović said, adding that there was no regulation prescribing either the imposition or the lifting of such measures.
In these cases, he explained, no decision banning entry into the country was issued.
In response to a question from the defendant Lazović, the witness said that he informed him that Belivuk and Miljković were under 24-hour surveillance and that their contacts were being monitored.
After the conclusion of the testimony, prosecutor Šoškić stated that Damjanović had repeatedly said that the ban had been lifted and that his testimony was consistent with the testimony of the now-deceased S. Đ. and with the provisions of the Law on Foreigners.
In response, attorney Piperović pointed out that although the testimony was consistent with that of S. Đ, it was not consistent with two crucial matters.
- He does not agree with the operative part of the indictment at all, he is completely at odds with it. Where does the Law on Foreigners come from now, because if I read correctly, that law is not mentioned in the operative part of the indictment. Witness Damjanović confirmed what Zoran Lazović stated in his defense - Piperović said.
The attorney asked what purpose these and future witnesses serve, given that there are no legal consequences.
Attorney Stefan Jovanović stated that the „lifting of the ban on entry into Montenegro“ was an operational activity and that witness Damjanović had indicated it was a successful operation.
- The operational activity was not accompanied by a formal decision on a ban on entry - Jovanović said.
In addition to Damjanović, witness Nikola Žižić was also examined today. He has been employed in the Department for the Fight Against Crime since 2020. He was categorical that he had never heard, nor had anyone ever asked him, to ensure that a person was not prosecuted - neither Zoran Lazović nor Čađenović, and that he had never discussed cases with them.
The trial continues tomorrow with the examination of witnesses Jovanka Krunić and Milan Mrvaljević.

Damjanović: Had I been handling the Belivuk and Miljković case, I would have acted in exactly the same way

Postupanje Specijalnog državnog tužilaštva u vezi sa predmetom koji se vodi pred Osnovnim sudom na Cetinju, a koji se odnosi i na zločin u Medovini, između ostalog, ukazuje na nerazumijevanje važnosti i osjetljivosti sudskog postupka, ali i trauma porodica žrtava od strane SDT-a, upozoravaju iz Centra za građansko obrazovanje.
- Iako SDT ima zakonsko pravo da zatraži spise radi razmatranja krivične prijave, zadržavanje te dokumentacije duže od mjesec dana dovelo je do odlaganja glavnog pretresa i završnih riječi. Time se odstupilo od dobre prakse blagovremenog vraćanja spisa predmeta, a posljedično doprinijelo i ugrožavanju prava na suđenje u razumnom roku, koje je ključno za povjerenje u pravosuđe i vladavinu prava- poručuju iz CGO.
Tragedija u Medovin, podsjećaju iz CGO, &nbsp;ostavila je trajne posljedice za porodice žrtava. Odgovorna i učinkovita reakcija institucija može makar djelimično ublažiti bol kroz utvrđivanje istine i odgovornosti. Na drugoj strani, svako odugovlačenje nosi rizik sekundarne viktimizacije i dodatne traumatizacije porodica i zajednice.&nbsp;
- &nbsp;Grupa građana koja je više od 300 dana na Kruševom ždrijelu tražila pravdu za 23 ugašena života, među kojima je četvoro djece, dobitnici su godišnje nagrade CGO-a i Festivala UBRZAJ za ljudska prava i građanski aktivizam za 2025. Nagradu je u njihovo ime primila Vesna Pejović, majka i baba troje stradalih u prvom masakru na Cetinju- poručuju iz CGO.
<div class="embed-block"><div style="max-width: 550px;"><div style="left: 0; width: 100%; height: 0; position: relative; padding-bottom: 100%;"><iframe src="https://cdn.iframe.ly/api/iframe?app=1&url=https%3A%2F%2Fx.com%2FCGOCCE%2Fstatus%2F2018623608667377917&key=87ca3314a9fa775b5c3a7726100694b0" style="top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute; border: 0;" allowfullscreen></iframe></div></div></div>
 
&nbsp;

CGO: Zadržavanjem dokumentacije o slučaju Medovina, SDT odstupa od dobre prakse i ugrožava pravo na suđenje u razumnom roku

The Special State Prosecutor’s Office (SSPO) has recently launched a preliminary investigation based on a criminal complaint filed against the management of the Radio Television of Montenegro (Radio Televizija Crne Gore) by the Employees’ Union, over the non-transparent spending of funds allocated for employee bonuses – the union announced at a press conference.
The Employees’ Union of the Radio Television of Montenegro also organized the press conference to address, as they stated, anti-union discrimination being carried out against its members and the failure to sign a collective agreement.
It was announced at the conference that immediately after the preliminary investigation was launched, a new and so far unprecedented wave of pressure and intimidation against members of the Employees’ Union followed, resulting in 16 members leaving the union in just ten days.
Snežana Radusinović, a member of the Executive Board of the Employees’ Union, said that the subject of the complaint they filed in July concerns the non-transparent spending of funds for employee bonuses and fees paid to external associates.
- As of today, we can confirm the information that 735.000 euros gross per year is spent on bonuses, and over 400.000 euros on external associates - Radusinović said.
She added that this is an enormous sum of money being spent in a non-transparent manner, creating significant room for abuse of budgetary funds.
- Several reliable sources have confirmed to us that ten days ago the SSPO, acting on this complaint, launched a preliminary investigation at the Radio Television of Montenegro. Immediately afterward, a new and unprecedented wave of pressure and intimidation against our members followed, and in just ten days 16 members left the Union - Radusinović said.
She stated that on Friday they again addressed the SSPO and the Chief Special State Prosecutor Vladimir Novović.
- We requested that the prosecution, by exercising its competencies and powers through lawful procedures, urgently take measures to protect us from pressure exerted by the management - Radusinović added.
According to her, all of this is directly connected to negotiations on salary increases at the Radio Television of Montenegro, which have been ongoing for more than a year.
Eva Poleksić, President of the Employees’ Union, said that at a meeting recently held at the Ministry of Finance with representatives of the new union and the management, they were informed that bonuses at the Public Broadcaster reach up to 2.000 euros.
- Due to such high bonuses for privileged individuals at the Public Broadcaster, management is in no hurry to increase salaries, while the majority of employees, including media professionals, remain on minimum wage - Poleksić said.
In addition, she noted that not a single euro from last year’s budget of 24,5 million euros, of which 900.000 euros had been planned for salary increases, was spent for that purpose.
Poleksić added that all the money was redirected to other purposes, including construction works and public procurement.
- Are we facing the same scenario this year, when the budget of the Radio Television o Monenegro amounts to 26,38 million euros - Poleksić asked.
She said that in November, after exhausting and lengthy negotiations, they harmonized new pay coefficients with representatives of the management and the new union, but that this collective agreement has already received three negative opinions from the Ministry of Finance.
- Although we submitted a proposal of coefficients on December 30, integrating the Ministry of Finance’s guidelines with the aim of preserving projected salaries, this proposal was not even considered at the Public Broadcaster during January - Poleksić said.
She emphasized that the Ministry of Finance expressed readiness to provide an opinion on the revised proposal of coefficients in the shortest possible time.
- However, colleagues from the new union and the management interpret the Ministry of Finance’s recommendations in a completely different way, which creates an ideal scenario for delaying salary increases that could last for months - Poleksić said.
She stated that the pressure the union has been exposed to for over a year has escalated in recent days.
- This is not only an attack on the legally guaranteed right to union activity, but also on the negotiation process which, if we follow the Ministry of Finance’s guidelines, could be concluded as early as this week - Poleksić stressed.
Radusinović emphasized that the key issue is for the Radio Television of Montenegro pay coefficients to be aligned with the principle of equal pay in the public sector for the same or similar jobs requiring the same level of qualifications.
- Therefore, for a certain number of professions, the proposed coefficients must be reduced - Radusinović stated.
She said that on December 30 they submitted a proposal that has now been awaiting consideration for a month, despite the Ministry of Finance stating it could provide feedback within one day.
- This is a strong indicator that we are witnessing deliberate delays in these negotiations - Radusinović said.
She stressed that it is very important to know that all three negotiating parties at least in principle agree on preserving the projected salaries.
- Since this cannot be achieved solely through coefficients, the Ministry of Finance proposes applying a legal provision for professions whose coefficients will be adjusted, allowing for supplements for certain occupations. Through this supplement, salaries would be increased by the same percentage by which the coefficient would be reduced - Radusinović clarified.
According to her, applying this Ministry of Finance model would preserve projected salary amounts for every Public Broadcaster employee.
- At the moment, we interpret this model differently. As you know, differing interpretations are problematic in situations like this and provide fertile ground for indefinite delays of the process - Radusinović added.
Secretary General of the Union of Free Trade Unions Srđa Keković recalled that the Criminal Code of Montenegro stipulates that any obstruction or prevention of union activity constitutes a criminal offense punishable by a fine or up to one year in prison.
He said that today’s press conference was an attempt to expose everything that has been happening over the past months, as well as an effort to reach out again to members who, in the meantime, „withdrew their membership under pressure“.
- And, of course, to reach all other employees so they understand that if they do not have an authentic union willing to bear the burden of union struggle, they will not have better working conditions in the period ahead - Keković stated.
He added that, in addition to salary, an individual can receive up to 2.000 euros per month, and that no one in the state is paying attention to this issue.

Non-transparent spending of funds: SSPO launches preliminary investigation following a complaint by the Employees’ Union of the Radio Television of Montenegro

Iz Specijalnog državnog tužilaštva (SDT) saopšteno je da su neistiniti navodi da su „preuzeli predmet u slučaju Medovina“.
- Obavještavamo da Specijalno državno tužilaštvo nije preuzelo krivično gonjenje u predmetima Osnovnog državnog tužilaštva u Cetinju, protiv okrivljene O.K., za produženo krivično djelo zloupotreba službenog položaja i krivično djelo nesavjestan rad u službi, protiv koje je u toku krivični postupak pred Osnovnim sudom u Cetinju, jer za to nema zakonskog osnova i razloga - naveli su oni u saopštenju.
Naprotiv, kažu da je Specijalno državno tužilaštvo, radi odlučivanja o krivičnoj prijavi O.K., protiv državnih tužilaca u Osnovnom državnom tužilaštvu u Cetinju i za krivično djelo zloupotreba službenog položaja, koristeći ovlašćenja iz Zakonika o krivičnom postupku i Zakona o Državnom tužilaštvu, odnosno Zakona o Specijalnom državnom tužilaštvu, tražilo sudske spise radi uvida i razmatranja, kako bi donijelo odluku o krivičnoj prijavi.
- Nakon razmatranja i kopiranja, spisi su vraćeni Osnovnom sudu u Cetinju - naveli su u SDT-u.

SDT: Nijesmo preuzeli krivično gonjenje u predmetu Medovina

Apelacioni sud će odlučivati o zahtjevu Specijalnog državnog tužilaštva koje traži određivanje pritvora mojoj klijentkinji Vesni Medenici bivšoj predsjednici Vrhovnog suda - kazao je za Portal ETV njen advokat Zdravko Begović ali je dodao da on nije dobio žalbu ali pretpostavlja da je odluka na Apelacionom sudu.
Begović je kategoričan da objektivno ne postoji bilo koji razlog da bi Vesni Medenica pobjegla.
- Vesna Medenica je sve vrijeme vođenja glavnih preetresa bila prisutna i nijedan glavni pretres zbog nje nije odgođen iako je bila ozbiljno bolesna. Podsjetiću i da je vještak konstatovao da se prave pauze zbog njenih zdravstvenih problem - kazao je Begović.
Aposlutno je sve opravdano osim, kako kaže, zahtjeva SDT- a da joj se odredi pritvor jer ona nikada nije prekršila mjeru koja je bila izrečena od Suda.
On ističe i da Vesni Medenici nije bio oduzet pasoš, putna isprava i kod nje je bio sve vrijeme tokom trajanja postupka. Kada je sutkinja Vesna Kovačević na izricanju presude saopštila da putne isprave treba da joj budu oduzete i da ne smije da napušta Kolašin njegova klijentkinja je, kako kaža, sama predala dokumenta.
- Nakon objavljivanja presude ona je pošla u Odjeljenje bezbjednosti Kolašin i predala svoj pasoš kao jedan vid ozbiljne garancije da neće pobjeći i mi smo odmah o tome obavijestili sud. Dostavili smo potvrdu o oduzetom pasošu - kazao je Begović.
Vesna Medenica osuđena je 28. januar na deset godina zatvora, a njen sin Miloš Medenica na deset godina i dva mjeseca i da plate po 50.000 eura. Policija od srijede nakon izricanje presue traga za Milošem Medenicom. Crnogorske vlasti su za njim raspisale nacionalnu i međunarodnu potjernicu.

Begović: Apelacioni sud će odlučivati o pritvoru za Medenicu, ali zahtjev SDT-a neosnovan

Nakon što ročište u Osnovnom sudu na Cetinju, u postupku protiv Olivere Krivokapić u vezi sa masakrom na Medovini, nije održano jer je Specijalno državno tužilaštvo (SDT) preuzelo cjelokupne spise predmeta u trenucima kada je postupak bio pred samim krajem, pravni zastupnik porodica Zdravko Đukanović <a href="https://www.antenam.net/clanak/advokat-dukanovic-potez-sdt-a-u-slucaju-medovina-nepravilan-i-rijedak-trazicemo-da-se-spisi-vrate-u-najhitnijem-roku">za Antenu M</a> navodi da je ovakvo postupanje nepravilno kao i da je sama situacija rijetka.
- Ukoliko je SDT-u bilo neophodno da izvrši uvid u spise iz bilo kog razloga u koje mi ne ulazimo, sasvim je sigurno da je taj uvid mogao da se izvrši za mnogo kraći period i da se predmet vrati prije ročišta koje je u srijedu odloženo iz tog razloga. Druga mogućnost je bila da se sačekaju završne riječi koje su trebale da se održe u srijedu i da se nakon toga zatraže spisi predmeta nakon dostavljanja presude. Takvo postupanje bilo bi primjereno i u skladu sa zakonom - poručuje Đukanović.
Dodatnu sumnju na cijeli slučaj baca i činjenica da sutkinja koja je vodila ovaj predmet, Marija Ćupić, ali ni sami Đukanović, do 28. januara nijesu obaviješteni da spisi neće biti vraćeni, kao ni o razlogu za ovu odluku.
Vesna Pejović, majka i baba žrtava masakra na Medovini, je ranije za Antenu M poručila da je zbog odluke SDT-a pisala ambasadoru EU u Crnoj Gori Johanu Satleru. 
Đukanović kaže da će SDT-u dostaviti dopis kojim će tražiti da se predmet u najhitnijem roku vrati Osnovnom sudu u Cetinju radi okončanja krivićnog postupka protiv Olivere Krivokapić.
- Takođe ćemo kao punomočnici porodica oštečenih dastaviti krivićne postupke protiv svih drugih odgovornih lica koji su svojim nečinjenjem u značajnoj mjeri doprinijeli da do tragedije u Medovini dođe. Izvan svake, sumnje niko od onih koji su propustili da rade ono što je njihov posao po zakonu, neće ostati bez postupka i utvrđivanja lične odgovornosti - zaključio je advokat.

Advokat Đukanović: Potez SDT-a u slučaju Medovina nepravilan i rijedak, tražićemo da se spisi vrate u najhitnijem roku

Građani koji su mjesecima blokirali saobraćaj na Kruševom ždrijelu zahtijevajući odgovornost nadležnih za dva masakra na Cetinju poručili su da najoštrije osuđuju netransparentnost Specijalnog državnog tužilaštva (SDT) cijeneći da su pod velom tajne i bez ikakvog jasnog obrazloženja preuzeli predmet u slučaju Medovine od cetinjskog Osnovnog suda.
- Grupa građana sa Kruševog Ždrijela najoštrije osuđuje ovakvu netransparentnost i poručuje da takvi potezi institucija ne donose ni istinu, ni pravdu, ni mir porodicama žrtava, niti spokoj ubijenima - već samo produbljuju sumnju, revolt i nepovjerenje javnosti - decidni su oni.
<div class="embed-block"><div><div style="left: 0; width: 100%; height: 0; position: relative; padding-bottom: 48%; padding-top: 120px;"><iframe src="https://cdn.iframe.ly/api/iframe?app=1&url=https%3A%2F%2Fetv.me%2Fhronika%2Fsdt-oduzelo-predmet-cetinjskom-sudu-uoci-zavrsnih-rijeci-dukanovic-tuzilastvo-mora-imati-visok-nivo-postovanja-prema-porodicama-zrtava%3Famp%3D1&key=87ca3314a9fa775b5c3a7726100694b0" style="top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute; border: 0;" allowfullscreen></iframe></div></div></div>
Ističu da se, nakon tri i po godine čekanja na istinu, pravdu i odgovornost za 23 nasilno oduzeta života, građani i porodice žrtava ponovo suočavaju sa netransparentnim odlukama institucija koje dodatno produbljuju bol, sumnju i nepovjerenje.
- Posebno zabrinjava činjenica da je predmet oduzet u samoj završnici postupka, u trenutku kada se očekuju završne riječi. Zato s pravom pitamo: Ko se uplašio završnih riječi? Da li je za nekoga istina o Medovini postala opasna? Koga štitite? Javne reakcije Asocijacije MNE–USA Cetinje, kao i potresne riječi Vesne Pejović, majke ubijene ćerke i dva dječaka, dodatno potvrđuju ono što građani odavno osjećaju - da neko ne želi da se istina do kraja utvrdi - naveli su u grupi građana sa Kruševog ždrijela.
Podsjećaju da su 11 mjeseci mirno i dostojanstveno blokirali put Podgorica – Cetinje – Budva, ne iz hira, već iz očaja i potrebe da ih država čuje.
- Ako neko danas misli da se povjerenje u institucije može vratiti skrivanjem odluka, oduzimanjem predmeta preko noći i ćutanjem, grdno se vara. Postavljamo jasno pitanje crnogorskoj javnosti i nadležnima: Da li je ovo pokušaj da se građani ponovo izvedu na ulice i blokade, jer drugog odgovora institucija nema? - naveli su oni.
Građani sa Kruševog Ždrijela, kako su podvuki, zahtijevaju hitno i javno obrazloženje razloga za preuzimanje predmeta, potpunu transparentnost u daljem postupanju, garancije da se postupak neće odugovlačiti niti relativizovati odgovornost.
- Istina se ne može sakriti. Pravda se ne može oduzeti dekretom. A odgovornost, prije ili kasnije, mora imati ime i prezime. U suprotnom, neko svjesno bira da ponovo gazi već duboko poljuljano povjerenje građana i porodica žrtava u crnogorske institucije - zaključili su u saopštenju.

Građani sa Kruševog ždrijela: SDT pod velom tajne preuzelo predmet, ovakvi potezi ne donose istinu, pravdu ni mir porodicama žrtava

Osnovni sud u Podgorici saopštio je da je policija, u slučaju osuđene Lidije Mitrović, po naredbi suda postupala u razumnom roku i u skladu sa zakonom.
U Osnovnom sudu podsjećaju da su narebu za prinudno dovođenje osuđene Lidije Mitrović izdali 14. januara, nakon što joj nije mogao biti uručen poziv na datoj adresi.
- Ovu naredbu Uprava policije je primila 19. januara 2026. godine (ponedeljak), nakon sprovedene neophodne administrativne procedure u dostavljanju - navedeno je u saopštenju Osnovnog suda.
Dodaje se da je policija u više navrata tražila Mitrović i sačinila obavještenje sudu 30. januara 2026. godine, u kome se konstatuje da osuđena izbjegava policiju. Sud je, dodaju, obavještenje primio 2. februara, kada je naređeno izdavanje potjernice.&nbsp;
- Obzirom na postupanje policije u razumnom roku, kada se preduzima više radnji radi izvođenja zaključka da li neko lice izbjegava prijem poziva, nije bilo razloga za urgenciju u postupanju. Dakle, u redovnom postupanju, vrijeme od 11 dana ne iziskuje potrebu obraćanja suda policiji o preduzetim radnjama po naredbi, budući da je istoj potrebno preduzimanje više radnji i traženja odnosnog lica u više navrata, kako bi se dalo konačno i valjano obavještenje sudu, koje se cijeni za ispunjenost uslova za naređivanje potjernice - ističe se u saopštenju Osnovnog suda.
Ukazuju da je saradnja između ovog suda i policije na dobrom nivou, te da u postupanju, do sada, nisu primijećeni problemi koji se nisu mogli u skladu sa zakonom i prevazići.
- Radi efikasnijeg postupanja i bolje saradnje u kontinuitetu se održavaju sastanci predstavnika suda i policije. Posebno upućujemo na sastanak sa direktorom policije Lazarom Šćepanovićem u prostorijama Osnovnog suda, na kome se razgovaralo upravo o unapređenju saradnje po pitanjima postupanja po naredbama suda, koje su sada predmet vašeg interesovanja. Zaključke sa sastanka možete vidjeti na sajtu suda, objava od 18. februara 2025. godine - poručeno je u saopštenju Osnovnog suda.

Osnovni sud o slučaju Lidije Mitrović: Policija postupila ažurno

U večerašnjoj Informativnoj emisiji "24 sata" od 19 sati pogledajte: Tema dana: Posljedice manipulacija tužilačkim dokazima.
Ostale teme:
- Šta nam govore posljednja bjekstva o stanju u bezbjednosnom sektoru?
- Promjena odluke predsjednika Milatovića o usvajanju zakona
- Ponovo podignuta optužnica za ubistvo Danke Ilić
- Doživotna kazna za pokušaj atentata na Donalda Trampa iz 2024.
Gost "24 sata" je advokat Marko Radović.
Informativnu emisiju večeras vodi Itana Kaluđerović.

Informativna emisija "24 sata": Gost Marko Radović, tema dana - posljedice manipulacija tužilačkim dokazima

Sud za prekršaje u Budvi je danas je, trojici okrivljenih u tri odvojena hitna postupka zbog teških saobraćajnih prekršaja na teritoriji te opštine, izrekao 5.000 eura novčanih kazni. 
U četvrtom postupku povratniku u vršenju saobraćajnih prekršaja povezanih sa zloupotrebom narkotika izrečena je kazna zatvora od 30 dana, nakon izrečenih 15 dana zatvora u postupku koji je sproveden dan ranije.
- Okrivljenima, među kojima je i jedan strani državljanin koji je kaznu platio odmah po izricanju, osim kazni izrečeno je ukupno 20 mjeseci zabrane upravljanja motornim vozilima, koje će sprovesti Uprava policije Crne Gore po pravosnažnosti odluka - navedeno je u saopštenju Suda za prekršaje.
Istovremeno, Uprava policije intenzivirala je rad po izdatim naredbama suda za sprovođenje kažnjenih lica u UIKS Spuž.
- Stoga se ukazuje svim licima koja imaju dug u registru novčanih kazni da iste izmire u najhitnijem roku i tako izbjegnu donošenje rješenja o preinačavanju novčanih kazni u kazne zatvora - poručuju iz budvanskog Suda za prekršaje.

Budva: Za dan izrečeno 5.000 eura kazni, povratniku 45 dana zatvora

Zastoj ili neizvjesnost u procesu proširenja mogao bi imati uticaj na raspoloženje javnosti, posebno imajući u vidu snažnu i dugogodišnju podršku građana Crne Gore članstvu u Evropskoj uniji, ocijenjeno je na sastanku potpredsjendika Vlade za vanjske i evropske poslove Filipa Ivanovića sa evropskim komesarom za unutrašnje poslove i migracije Magnusom Brunerom.
U fokusu razgovora bio je napredak Crne Gore u procesu evropske integracije i dalji tok pristupnih pregovora sa Evropskom unijom.
Ivanović je istakao je snažnu posvećenost Crne Gore ispunjavanju obaveza iz evropske agende, naglašavajući da je plan Vlade zatvaranje pregovaračkih poglavlja do kraja 2026. godine. Izrazio je očekivanje da će sve države članice prepoznati napore i rezultate Crne Gore, te podržati evropski put države i jasnu opredijeljenost njenih građana, koji u visokom procentu podržavaju članstvo u Evropskoj uniji.
U tom kontekstu, razgovarano je i o potencijalnim izazovima koji mogu uticati na dinamiku zatvaranja pregovaračkih poglavlja, kao i o širem političkom i društvenom značaju evropske integracije.
Bruner je naglasio da evropske institucije jasno prepoznaju napredak koji je Crna Gora ostvarila u pristupnom procesu, te potvrdio da Crna Gora ima punu podršku Evropske komisije u daljem napretku ka članstvu u Evropskoj uniji i zatvaranju pregovaračkih poglavlja. Ohrabrio je nastavak reformi i održavanje ambiciozne dinamike pregovora, dodajući da su ove reforme najbolja investicija u budućnost Crne Gore.&nbsp;
Kako je saopšteno iz Vlade, poseban akcenat stavljen je na vladavinu prava kao temelj evropske budućnosti Crne Gore. Ivanović je informisao sagovornika o reformama usmjerenim na jačanje nezavisnosti pravosuđa i autonomije državnog tužilaštva.
Sagovornici su razmijenili mišljenja i o globalnim političkim i bezbjednosnim kretanjima, sa posebnim osvrtom na njihov uticaj na evropsku politiku proširenja i stabilnost regiona Zapadnog Balkana. Istaknuta je važnost snažne saradnje između Crne Gore i institucija Evropske unije u odgovoru na savremene izazove.
Tokom sastanka razgovarano je i o saradnji u oblasti unutrašnjih poslova i migracija, uključujući dalju harmonizaciju vizne politike Crne Gore sa Evropskom unijom, reformu viznog informacionog sistema i jačanje institucionalnih kapaciteta u upravljanju migracijama, u skladu sa evropskim standardima.
- Sagovornici su potvrdili obostranu posvećenost nastavku intenzivnog dijaloga i partnerske saradnje u narednom periodu, u cilju ostvarivanja zajedničkog cilja – punopravnog članstva Crne Gore u Evropskoj uniji - navedeno je u saopštenju Vlade.

Tag: specijalno-drzavno-tuzilastvo