Specijalno državno tužilaštvo je Specijalnom odjeljenju Višeg suda u Podgorici podnijelo optužni prijedlog protiv okrivljenog bivšeg ministra poljoprivrede i ruralnog razvoja u Vladi Crne Gore Milutina Simovića.
On se, kako je navedeno u saopštenju SDT-a, tereti zbog postojanja osnovane sumnje da je učinio produženo krivično djelo zloupotreba službenog položaja, u čiji sastav ulazi 16 radnji izvršenja.
Simović je uhapšen 22. decembra 2025, a pušten je da se brani sa slobode 26. decembra.
Njemu se na teret stavlja zloupotreba službenog položaja, odnosno da je u periodu od 2017. do 2020. godine kao ministar poljoprivrede zloupotrijebio pravo na reprezentaciju.
- Osumnjičen je da je u roku od tri godine u desetak slučajeva zloupotrijebio pravo na reprezentaciju u ukupnom iznosu od oko 5.000 eura, te da je riječ o vise računa u iznosu od &nbsp;100 do oko 500 eura - rekao je ranije njegov advokat Miroslav Adzić za Portal ETV.

Portal ETV

original

viewImage

baseImage

610x380

500x500

400x240

400x203

thumbnail

Podnijet optužni prijedlog protiv Simovića

Bivša ministarka odbrane Olivera Injac je bila institucionalno zaštićena od Specijalnog državnog tužilaštva. Zloupotrijebila je službeni položaj u nekoliko slučajeva da je to za zatvor, tvrdi lider Demokratske narodne partije (DNP) Milan Knežević.
On je gostujući na TV Adria saopštio da se u Specijalnom državnom tužilaštvu selektivno postupa. Komentarisao je i obraćanje bivše specijalne tužiteljke Lidije Mitrović koja tvrdi da je njen višegodišnji progon organizovan i vođen od strane Novovića, a u vezi predmeta Injac.
- Prema onome što sam vidio kao predsjednik Odbora za bezbjednost i odbranu, zloupotrijebila službeni položaj u nekoliko slučajeva da je to, po mom mišljenju, za zatvor. Zatvor kao kuća. Kako je i zašto glavni specijalni tužilac Vladimir Novović dao dva obavezujuća uputstva za gospođu Oliveru Injac, to je pitanje za njega, ali i za vrhovnog državnog tužioca Markovića i Tužilački savjet.. O ovome treba da se izjasni Tužilački savjet jer je ovo potpuno u suprotnosti sa zakonom o tužilaštvu - ocijenio je Knežević.
<h2>„PES nikako ne diraju, Injac trebala da bude u pritvoru zbog zloupotreba službenog položaja“</h2>
Ponovio je da SDT nastupa selektivno, ali i problematizovao senzacionalna hapšenja i to što niko „ne dira“ Pokret Evropa sad. Takođe, Knežević je podsjetio da je Novović izdao čak dva obavezna uputstva specijalnoj tužiteljki Mitrović zbog predmeta Injac.
- Hapsi kroz senzacionalne i rijaliti ambijente i atmosferu tzv dva suprotna pola – crnogorski i srpski, to jest nekadašnji DF i nekadašnji DPS. Ali PES nikako ne diraju. Jer Injac je trebala da bude u pritvoru. Nemam ja ništa protiv nje, ali ova gospođa je trebala da bude u pritvoru zbog zloupotreba službenog položaja koji je počinila dok je bila ministarka odbrane. Postavljam pitanje kome su se još dala dva obavezujuća uputstva u slučajevima zloupotrebe položaja, kao što su dali Oliveri Injac. Nikome, samo gospođi Injac. I gdje je sad, eto je ambasadorka u Briselu. Dakle, ona je nagrađena - smatra lider DNP-a.
<h2>„Šćepanović sam sebi dao nadimak tigar, i misli da svi moramo da ga zovemo tajgerom“</h2>
Komentarisao je i rad direktora Uprave policije Lazara Šćepanovića. Ukazao je na način rezonovanja Šćepanovića podsjetivši na izjavu predsjednika podgoričkog Višeg suda Zorana Radovića koji je rekao da bi Šćepanoviću trebalo zabraniti da tumači pravne norme.
- Zamislite kada direktoru policije pošaljete poruku da mu treba zabraniti da tumači pravne norme. Taj čovjek je direktor policije. Jednom sam saopštio da je mene malo strah od njega.. On nastupa, on je sam sebi dao nadimak tigar, kad su išli u Ameriku. Pa je sam sebi dao nadimak tajger, i on misli da mi svi moramo da ga zovemo tajgerom... E ja ga neću zvat, da ne pričam sad dogodovštine što se dešavalo u SAD kako je srušio kuću od šperploče jer je pogrešno upalio auto, umjesto naprijed on ga je upalio u rikverc i to se sve srušilo tamo. A da ne govorim o bezbjednosnoj provjeri vezano za agenta koji ga je obučavao Konstansa se preziva, a neka me demantuje ako to nije tačno. Što je on uradio Konstansi kada je bio u Podgorici, ali da ne ulazim u detalje. Samo da ne misle da smo mi šašavi - rekao je Knežević.
Knežević smatra da Šćepanović ne može biti direktor policije i da treba da bude smijenjen.
<h2>„Ako je što kriva Vesna Bratić, Zdravko Krivokapić treba da bude šef OKG“</h2>
Govoreći o poslednjim hapšenjima, Knežević pita i zašto ćuti bivši premijer Zdravko Krivokapić na hapšenje bivše ministarke prosvjete, nauke, kulture i sporta Vesne Bratić. Po njegovom mišljenju, Krivokapić bi trebalo da bude označen kao šef organizovane kriminalne grupe.
- Ako je što kriva Vesna Bratić, onda treba Zdravko Krivokapić da bude član OKG-a jer je bio premijer Vlade, znači on je šef OKG. Zdravko Krivokapić najbolje zna što je tražio sve od Vesne Bratić. Mislim da Krivokapić, ako odgovara Bratić, treba da bude označen za šefa OKG. Jer ovo je posao SDT-a što znači da je ovo organizovana kriminalna grupa, jer Bratić više nije javni funkcioner što će reći da ovdje ima više ljudi uključenih. Očekujem da tu bude i Zdravko Krivokapić - ističe lider DNP-a.
Dodaje i da je hapšenje Blaža Šaranovića „ izvedeno toliko spektakularno kao da je bio zarobio 20 talaca na aerodromu ili negdje i da su ga onda uhapsili poslije duge istražne akcije“.
- Ipak je ovo Crna Gora, ipak se mi svi znamo. Nisu potrebne te medijske teatralnosti koje se na kraju završe farsom, jer većina tih ljudi se na kraju pusti. Smatram i da su Jelenu Perović mogli da uhapse na mnogo drugačiji način, bez onog spektakla, kao i mnoge druge koje su hapsili a posle su ti ljudi puštani. Ako ćete nekoga da uhapsite, zašto morate prvo da obavijestite medije pa da dođe 30 kamera, pa da vas svi snimaju i slikaju. Kome šaljete poruku? Možete li nekoga da uhapsite a da ne moraju da budu upaljene kamere? Ili je potrebno da se upale kamere za sve. Nije prirodno da se od svakog hapšenja u Crnoj Gori pravi rijaliti i senzacija, a onda kad pobjegne Miloš Medenica onda je to vještačka inteligencija. Kada nešto ne možemo da riješimo onda je to vještačka inteligencija, a kada treba da se uberu poeni – e onda se sve kamere popale - rekao je za Adriu Knežević.

1250x600

1084x550

Knežević o slučaju Injac: Zatvor kao kuća, SDT nastupa selektivno

The Supreme State Prosecutor Milorad Marković assessed as lawful the actions of Chief Special Prosecutor Vladimir Novović, under whose order the complete case files against former Minister of Defense and current Ambassador of Montenegro to Belgium, Olivera Injac, were seized on November 24, 2022 from their, now fugitive, colleague Lidija Mitrović.
This follows from the responses that the Supreme State Prosecutor’s Office sent yesterday to the Adria Portal.
The Adria Portal asked the prosecution office headed by Marković whether it would examine the official note in which fugitive prosecutor Mitrović stated that prosecutor Jovan Vukotić, acting on Novović’s orders, seized the case files against Olivera Injac from her office during her absence and without her knowledge.
The Supreme State Prosecutor’s Office was also asked whether it would review the conduct of prosecutors Vukotić and Novović in the entire case, following Mitrović’s accusation that the Chief Special Prosecutor had protected former minister Injac from criminal prosecution.
- In relation to the allegations made by former special prosecutor Lidija Mitrović, the Supreme State Prosecutor Milorad Marković conducted an extraordinary review and requested a statement from the Chief Special Prosecutor. After examining the submitted statement and the mandatory instructions, the Supreme State Prosecutor found that the actions of the Chief Special Prosecutor were proper and lawful - the response from the Supreme State Prosecutor’s Office states.
Prosecutor Marković, they told the Adria Portal yesterday, informed the members of the Prosecutorial Council about the matter the day before.
On April 17, Adria Portal published the official note drafted by prosecutor Mitrović after, as she claims, the case files against Injac were taken from her office.
Mitrović stated in the note that this happened on the same day she had submitted the indictment against the former minister to the registry of the Special State Prosecutor’s Office, so it could be forwarded to the High Court in Podgorica.
<h2>What did Mitrović charge Injac with?</h2>
In the indictment, which Adria Portal had access to, prosecutor Mitrović charged Injac with the continued criminal offense of abuse of office.
The indictment states that from December 2020 to February 2021, in her capacity as Minister of Defense, Injac unlawfully used her official position in order to obtain a benefit for retired Warrant Officer of the Armed Forces of Montenegro Miodrag Jokanović.
She allegedly concluded a service contract with Jokanović for tasks which, according to regulations and the Rulebook on the Internal Organization of the Ministry of Defense, fall within the core activities of the ministry and are to be filled through a public vacancy announcement, not through a service contract.
According to the indictment, the contract was valid from December 21, 2020 to March 21, 2021, with a monthly compensation of 300 euros. However, the indictment states that the contract was mutually terminated on January 31, 2021, but this was allegedly not recorded in the ministry’s protocols.
Despite this, Mitrović claims that on January 30 and February 26, 2021, Injac signed requests to the State Treasury for the payment of compensation to Jokanović, thereby „obtaining unlawful financial gain of 480 euros per month“ for him.
Prosecutor Mitrović also accused Injac of, contrary to the Law on Civil Servants, which prohibits the employment of pensioners, as well as the laws on the army and military intelligence affairs, issuing decisions by which Jokanović, a recipient of an old-age pension and former member of the Armed Forces of Montenegro, was employed for an indefinite period in the Intelligence and Security Directorate of the Ministry of Defense.
Although, according to Mitrović, he did not meet the legal requirements for deployment to a mission, nor was he prepared and trained in accordance with the standards of the international organization under whose mandate the mission was conducted, Jokanović was deployed to the international KFOR mission in Kosovo for a duration of one year, with the right to a daily allowance of 70 euros and other benefits.
The indictment against Injac states that Jokanović thereby obtained unlawful financial gain in the amount of 29.304 euros, to the detriment of the Ministry of Defense.
During the investigation, Injac denied all allegations.
<h2>From Injac, through Vardar, Klap and Bora, to escapement</h2>
Several months after, as she claims in her official note, the Injac case was taken from her, an investigation was launched against Mitrović on suspicion that she had abused her official position in another case – „Vardar-Klap-Bora“.
The investigation ended with the filing of an indictment against Mitrović, signed by her colleague Miloš Šoškić, and the subsequent court proceedings concluded with a conviction - on November 2, 2023, Mitrović was sentenced to seven months in prison for abuse of office.
She avoided reporting to Spuž prison in January of this year by fleeing, after which an international Interpol arrest warrant was issued for her.
She addressed the public from hiding, on February 8, in a letter in which she held Chief Special Prosecutor Vladimir Novović responsible for what she described as her persecution and suffering, accusing him of protecting former minister Olivera Injac from criminal prosecution.
Novović denied all of this, countering with accusations that, in handling the case against Injac, Mitrović had committed „numerous violations of the Law on the State Prosecutor’s Office, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Rulebook on the Internal Operations of the State Prosecutor’s Office, and the Annual Work Schedule“. For this reason, he claims, he issued her two written mandatory instructions.
- Mitrović did not complete work on the criminal case before being suspended from duty due to the initiation of criminal proceedings against her by decision of the Prosecutorial Council - the Special State Prosecutor’s Office stated at the beginning of the month.
The Prosecutorial Council suspended Mitrović on June 23, 2023. Two years later, on June 5, 2025, she was dismissed from office.
What happened in the meantime with the case against Injac has not been disclosed.

Marković conducted an extraordinary review and determined that Novović acted in accordance with the law

Specijalno državno tužilaštvo (SDT) saslušaće u srijedu, u svojstvu osumnjičene, nekadašnju ministarku ekologije, prostornog planiranja i urbanizma Anu Novaković-Đurović zbog rušenja postrojenja Montenegro Petrola u Mahali februara 2023. godine, saznaje<a href="https://www.antenam.net/clanak/sdt-ce-kao-osunjicenu-saslusavati-novakovic-durovic"> Antena M</a>.
U SDT su, takođe u svojstvu osumnjičenih, pozvani i nekadašnji generalni direktor Direktorata za građevinarstvo Goran Gorašević i nekadašnja državna sekretarka u Ministarstvu ekologije, prostornog planiranja i urbanizma Zorica Krsmanović.
Iz SDT-a su odbili da potvrde ovu informaciju.
- Uvaženi, Specijalno državno tužilaštvo ne obavještava javnost o dokaznim radnjama koje preduzima ili planira da preduzme radi zaštite interesa postupka i obezbjeđenja svrhe ostvarivanja dokaznih radnji -odgovorio je, nakon dva dana, na upit Antene M specijalni tužilac i portparol Vukas Radonjić.
Krivičnu prijavu zbog rušenja bez rješenja postrojenja Montenegro Petrola u Mahali podnio je još 2023. godine zastupnik te kompanije Nikola Martinović. U toku je i sudski proces pred Privrednim sudom po tužbi Montenegro Petrola protiv države, potencijalno težak četiri miliona eura.
Nekoliko dana uoči akcije tadašnje Vlade Dritana Abazovića, Osnovni sud u Podgorici donio je rješenje kojim je podgoričkoj kompaniji dozvoljeno da u Mahali radi i proizvodi beton, obrađuje materijal, uključujući i šljunak koji ne potiče sa lokacije u Mahali ili iz Morače.
Ipak, Vlada je u akciju rušenja krenula četiri dana kasnije, 13. februara 2023. Abazović je tada optužio Montenegro Petrol da se bavi nelegalnim aktivnostima, optužujući ih za bahatost.
Advokat Martinović je tvrdio da se akcija vlasti i rušenje postrojenja sprovode bez bilo kakve odluke državnog organa, te da je nadležnom tužiocu podnio krivičnu prijavu nakon što je srušeno postrojenje Montenegro Petrola na Morači.
Ovo je bio i predmet televizijske debate na Radio-televiziji Crne Gore, u kojoj je Abazović obećao zastupniku Montenegro Petrola Nikoli Martinoviću da će dostaviti svu dokumentaciju u vezi sa rušenjem postrojenja za proizvodnju betona u Mahali.
Martinović je tada, četiri dana nakon emisije, 27. februara 2023, tražio da mu se kompletna dokumentacija dostavi poštom, u elektronskoj verziji ili ličnim preuzimanjem, akcentirajući odluku o rušenju i dokaze da je pravosnažna i prethodno uručena strankama. Kako je odgovor izostao, Martinović je novi dopis uputio još jednom.&nbsp;
- Kad god treba podsjećati na ispunjenje datog obećanja, očigledno postoji nerazumijevanje u poimanju vrijednosti date riječi kao izraza morala i časti. Za ozbiljne ljude i ovaj dopis je višak, zato nakon ovoga više neću pisati, jer je to očigledno uzaludno - naveo je Martinović u drugom dopisu Abazoviću iz marta 2023. godine. Abazović obećanje do danas nije ispunio.
<h2>Tužba</h2>
Naredne godine, u februaru 2024, pred Privrednim sudom počeo je proces po tužbi Montenegro Petrola zbog nezakonitog rušenja postrojenja, u kojoj kompanija od države traži da joj plati odštetu u iznosu od četiri miliona eura.
Montenegro Petrol tužio je državu jer su, uz veliku medijsku pažnju i prisustvo najviših državnih zvaničnika, 13. februara 2023. srušeni njegovi objekti za proizvodnju šljunka.
Ministarstvo ekologije, prostornog planiranja i urbanizma, kojim je rukovodila Novaković-Đurović, 7. februara 2023. predložilo je Vladi da donese zaključak o proglašenju ekološke katastrofe u zahvatu vodoizvorišta Bolje sestre, pojasu uz rijeke Moraču i Cijevnu, tražeći hitno rušenje objekata.
Vlada je dva dana kasnije, na dan kada je vijeće Osnovnog suda donijelo rješenje kojim se dozvoljava rad postrojenja Montenegro Petrola, razmotrila ovu informaciju i zadužila Ministarstvo ekologije, prostornog planiranja i urbanizma i Agenciju za zaštitu životne sredine da hitno uklone i sruše objekte u zahvatu vodoizvorišta Bolje sestre, pojasu uz Moraču i Cijevnu.
Ministarstvo je potom državnoj firmi Zaštita prostora Crne Gore, 12. februara, naložilo uklanjanje i rušenje objekata uz rijeke Moraču i Cijevnu, nalažući da se sa rušenjem počne odmah.
Montenegro Petrol podnio je tužbu Privrednom sudu u maju iste godine, u kojoj su istakli da je država postupala krajnje nesavjesno, da je mašinske elemente rušila na nepodoban način, uzrokujući nepotrebnu štetu. Umjesto rastavljanja mašinskih elemenata postrojenja, oni su uništeni bagerom.
U tužbi se navodi i da su građevinski objekti srušeni bez prethodnog omogućavanja vlasniku da stvari iz unutrašnjosti objekata ukloni, pa su tako uništeni informacioni sistemi i oprema u upravljačkim kućicama, koje su služile za upravljanje i kontrolu cjelokupnog postrojenja.
Ističe se i da za rušenje nije postojao bilo kakav zakonit akt.
- O aktivnosti rušenja izvijestili su svi mediji u Crnoj Gori, jer je rušenje poslužilo kao politička promocija Dritana Abazovića, Vladimira Jokovića i Ane Novaković-Đurović - navodi se, između ostalog, u tužbi.

SDT na saslušanje pozvalo Novaković-Đurović

Minister of Justice Bojan Božović will not interfere in the work of the Special State Prosecutor’s Office by preparing, at the request of President Jakov Milatović, a proposal for her pardon, that is, exemption from criminal prosecution, „Vijesti“ reports.
- The minister has no intention of recommending to the president that he release someone against whom proceedings have only just begun and for whom no indictment has even been filed yet. That would set a precedent and would represent inappropriate interference of the executive branch in the work of the prosecution, in a case that does not reflect the spirit of the Law on Pardon - a source from the Ministry of Justice familiar with discussions within the ministry about this case told „Vijesti“.
Milatović’s office yesterday requested that the ministry „urgently act in accordance with the law“ by initiating proceedings ex officio and gathering information from other authorities, and then submitting to the president a reasoned proposal for a pardon „so that the president may exercise his constitutional and legal function of decision-making“.
Slavica Bratić publicly appealed the day before yesterday to Milatović „to, in accordance with his rights defined by the Law and the Constitution, release from criminal prosecution“ her „unjustly and abusively detained and imprisoned“ sister.
Vesna Bratić was remanded in custody for up to 30 days the day before yesterday in proceedings before the Special State Prosecutor’s Office, which charges her with abuse of office during the dismissal of directors of kindergartens, primary, and secondary schools in 2021, when she served as Minister of Education, Culture, Science and Sports.
SSPO spokesperson Vukas Radonjić said last night on the program „Načisto“ on TV Vijesti that detention was ordered because there is a risk she could flee to Bosnia and Herzegovina, whose citizenship she holds in addition to Montenegrin citizenship, and there is also suspicion that she could influence witnesses.
Under the Law on Pardon, the president may pardon a person convicted of a criminal offense by partially or fully releasing them from serving a prison sentence and mitigating other legal consequences, but may also release someone from criminal prosecution at any stage of the proceedings, including before a verdict.
In Bratić’s case, this would mean not only her immediate release from custody, but also the termination of any investigation - the same as if she had been finally acquitted before Montenegrin courts.
Sources from the legal profession and the ministry told „Vijesti“ that the last case of pardoning someone who had not yet been convicted occurred in 1997, when then-president Momir Bulatović pardoned Miodrag Daka Davidović.
A ministry source said that exemption from criminal prosecution is provided for by law only in very exceptional cases, which, they claim, is not the case with Vesna Bratić.
- For example, when an abused mother of three kills her violent husband in self-defense, and the president then pardons her for the benefit of the children - the source said.
The ministry is considering two possible negative responses to Milatović, as „the law is imprecise“. The source said one option is for the minister not to initiate proceedings at all, as one interpretation is that the law does not oblige him to do so. If he were to do so, the source claims, the ministry would soon be flooded with such requests „whenever someone is arrested“.
The other option is for Božović to initiate the procedure and send a negative opinion regarding Bratić’s exemption from criminal prosecution, although the minister’s opinion is not binding on the president, the „Vijesti“ source said.
A panel of the High Court is expected to decide today on the appeal filed by Vesna Bratić’s lawyer against the detention order.
Milatović has also joined the wave of protests over the arrest and detention of Vesna Bratić in handcuffs, along with accusations of selectivity by pro-Serbian political parties and certain state officials.
- Respecting the jurisdiction of judicial authorities in the proceedings against Vesna Bratić, it is evident that the manner of her arrest and the ordering of detention of a university professor has strongly resonated with the public, leaving the majority of citizens with the impression of treatment reserved for the gravest forms of crime - Milatović wrote on the social network X on Tuesday, before detention or custody was ordered.
According to Milatović, such a perception raises questions of standards and proportionality, especially given that in other cases individuals accused of significantly more serious criminal offenses were allowed to defend themselves from liberty.
- The rule of law implies equal standards - the determination and strength of the state toward organized crime, corruption, and fugitives, but also a measured, professional, and dignified approach toward those who are available to the institutions. Only consistency, without selectivity, can restore citizens’ trust in the system - he stated.

Božović will not recommend a pardon for Bratić

Novinar, pisac i kolumnista Dragan Bursać ocijenio je da se u svakom pokušaju amnestiranja nedavno uhapšene bivše ministarke prosvjete, nauke, kulture i sporta Vesne Bratić radi o direktnom podrivanju integriteta države. 
- Pogotovo kada to radi neko sa funkcije moći - zarad druge funkcije moći, Bratićkine - dodao je on gostujući u emisiji Na kraju dana na Televiziji E.
On je ocijenio da se odmah nakon hapšenja bivše ministarke reagovalo se po famoznoj matrici srpske ugroženosti.
- I reagovalo se po horizontali, po vertikali... Svi koji su mogli su reagovali. Ima jedan apsurd - mislim da bi Bratićka bila najsrećnija da je osuđena i optužena za to što radi - a da je neko srpstvo u pitanju, tad bi se mogla zaista prikazati kao nekakva žrtva, ali ono što je ona uradila, kako je uradila i zloupotrijebila svoj položaj dok je bila ministarka za sve i svašta, kako je minimum 140 ljudi, kako vidimo, oštećeno, pa su tužili državu, pa onda građani Crne Gore zapravo plaćaju Bratićkinu naknadnu, odnosno možda i pravu pamet. To je čitava poenta! Naravno da ako išta postoji u ovoj situaciji je to da se sudi nekome za zloupotrebu funkcije - rekao je Bursać.
Ističe da je Vesna Bratić mogla biti bilo ko po nacionalnosti, i da je to nebitno ali se, ukazuje on, iz vrha države Srbije, pojedinaca i važnih organizacija imputira klasična podmetačina koja je bila očekivana i predvidiva. 
- Vesna Bratić bi bila najsrećnija da je privedena zbog toga što joj se imputira, a ne zbog klasične zloupotrebe položaja. Ako Crna Gora misli, a nominalno misli, da uskoči u taj EU voz i da ide prema Briselu, mislim da joj upravo treba to da se riješi tih famoznih identitetskih problema i podjela. Ovdje da postoji neka identitetska podjela - neko je na funkciji moći zloupotrijebio tu moć, a drugi identiteti su građani Crne Gore svih vjera, nacija, partijskih opredjeljenja koji plaćaju identitetski promašaj osobe na poziciji moći. Vrlo je jednostavno sve to i to je suština, sve nakon toga je politizacija koja naravno dolazi od bojovnika "srpskog sveta" - naveo je Bursać.
To se, napominje, očekivalo.
- Ali mislim da bi u ovom trenutku država Crna Gora zaista trebalo da pokaže da je država i da se sudi nekome uhvaćenom u prekršaju - istakao je Bursać.
Kaže da se u sopstvenom dvorištu uzima u obzir presumpcija nevinosti, od privedenih se prave ugrožene žrtve i heroji, a ako se dešava hapšenje po direktivi partije, kao što su to, podsjeća on, radile Demokrate, onda se pravi audio-vizuelni spektakl od privođenja.
- To su početnički kvazi-demokratski promašaji, a sa druge strane ako gledamo to u ključu "srpskog sveta" - to njih apsolutno ne interesuje. U ovom slučaju je presumpcija nevinosti izraz koji su naučili prije dva dana i koji će ponavljati kao papige - ne bi li pokušali da obmanu javnost i ne bi li pokušali da zariju klipove u državu koja makar pokušava da radi nešto - zaključio je Bursać.

Bursać: Bratić bi bila najsrećnija da je privedena zbog toga što joj se imputira - a ne zbog klasične zloupotrebe položaja

From absolute protection to absolute persecution. That is how the relationship of Chief Special Prosecutor Vladimir Novović toward former Special Prosecutor Lidija Mitrović appears. She was sentenced to seven months in prison and is currently on the run. Less than four years ago, Novović flatly rejected a request from then-Minister of Defense Olivera Injac, who claimed that Special Prosecutor Mitrović was persecuting her out of revenge because the Ministry of Defense had not sent Mitrović’s son to study at the „Ikaron“ military academy in Greece.  <figure> <img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/2026021920024_a6344baeda8979aa7a1aaa70c3b5fa536d0b72f35a1b8df1130636261a07d986.png" data-media-id="editor_0" data-image-id="2026021920024_a6344baeda8979aa7a1aaa70c3b5fa536d0b72f35a1b8df1130636261a07d986" data-rendition-name="original" width="1600" height="1200" loading="lazy" alt="OD ZAŠTITE DO PROGONA, SAMO JE KORAK - POLITIKE: Lidija Mitrović i Vladimir Novović"> <figcaption>FROM PROTECTION TO PERSECUTION IS ONLY ONE STEP CALLED POLITICS: Lidija Mitrović and Vladimir Novović(Photo: Ilustracija: Balša PAVIĆEVIĆ)</figcaption> </figure>  <h2>PROSECUTORIAL PROTECTION OF PROSECUTOR MITROVIĆ</h2> On May 27, 2022, Vladimir Novović firmly rejected Olivera Injac’s request. - After reviewing the case files and obtaining a statement from Special Prosecutor Lidija Mitrović, I determined that Special Prosecutor Lidija Mitrović undertook official actions in the case in a timely and lawful manner - states, among other things, the decision of the Chief Special Prosecutor, noting that „none of the grounds for the recusal of the Special Prosecutor exist“. In addition to the Chief Special Prosecutor, his loyal deputy, Special Prosecutor Miloš Šoškić, directly sent positive evaluations of Lidija Mitrović’s work to the Prosecutorial Council.  <figure> <img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/2026021920028_40be344ef52ec362a0cabb71cdb9c20318a7662ff6a5df230b1d3b951487bf86.jpg" data-media-id="editor_1" data-image-id="2026021920028_40be344ef52ec362a0cabb71cdb9c20318a7662ff6a5df230b1d3b951487bf86" data-rendition-name="original" width="1920" height="1480" loading="lazy" alt="PIŠI KAKO TI JE NAREĐENO: Dopis Miloša Šoškića, zamjenika GST Novovića"> <figcaption>WRITE AS YOU ARE ORDERED: Letter from Miloš Šoškić, Deputy to Chief Special Prosecutor Novović (Photo: Portal ETV )</figcaption> </figure>  - I find that the allegations in the complaint of Minister of Defense Olivera Injac are unfounded, and that Special Prosecutor Lidija Mitrović undertook all actions in case Kt-S.br.63/21 in full compliance with the Criminal Procedure Code - Šoškić concluded. <h2>NOVOVIĆ’S TURNAROUND</h2> And then - completely - all actions of the Chief Special Prosecutor and his team at the Special State Prosecutor’s Office changed entirely. The previously protected Special Prosecutor Lidija Mitrović suddenly became the target of persecution by her colleagues. Meanwhile, Olivera Injac, who had been subject to prosecutorial proceedings until then, overnight became a specially protected figure, whose integrity was now guaranteed by Chief Special Prosecutor Vladimir Novović and his special team of prosecutors. During thirteen months at the head of the Ministry of Defense, former Minister Olivera Injac managed to accumulate four criminal complaints.  <figure> <img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/2026021920028_c2ca573b8a4b0c2964d25fca663463dd5ea4a27b67607f274fcd7106ca106be4.jpg" data-media-id="editor_2" data-image-id="2026021920028_c2ca573b8a4b0c2964d25fca663463dd5ea4a27b67607f274fcd7106ca106be4" data-rendition-name="original" width="916" height="515" loading="lazy" alt="ČETIRI KRIVIČNE PRIJAVE I - NIŠTA OD PROCESUIRANJA: Olivera Injac "> <figcaption>FOUR CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS - AND NO PROSECUTION: Olivera Injac(Photo: UGC )</figcaption> </figure>  <h2>FOUR COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE MINISTER OF DEFENSE</h2> The first criminal complaint, filed on March 23, 2021, charged Olivera Injac with abuse of office after she hired retired warrant officer of the Army of Montenegro, Miodrag Jokanović, into the Intelligence and Security Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Montenegro. The second complaint, filed on April 13, 2021, was also for abuse of office. Minister Injac allegedly hired active-duty military officer Lieutenant Colonel Veljko Mališić without a decision of the Defense Council and in violation of the Law on the Army of Montenegro. The third criminal complaint against Minister Injac concerned the „cadets“ affair and the unlawful elimination of Marko Mitrović, the son of Prosecutor Mitrović, from studying at a military academy in Greece. The fourth criminal complaint was filed by officer Igor Knežević for „abuse of office and constitutional discrimination carried out against him by Minister of Defense Olivera Injac“. <h2>POLITICAL ULTIMATUMS</h2> By issuing two binding instructions not to prosecute Olivera Injac, the Chief Special Prosecutor completely halted the processing of all other criminal complaints. In doing so, Novović ventured into explaining the inexplicable. In a binding instruction, he argued that hiring pensioner Jokanović into permanent employment, without professional qualifications, in the Intelligence and Security Directorate was not a serious violation of the law. Instead of legal reasoning, Novović used what could be described as a „flight through time“, concluding in a caricatured manner that Injac, who hired Jokanović on February 1, 2021, did not break the law even though Jokanović’s pension payments were suspended a month later, meaning he was simultaneously receiving both a salary and a pension. The Special State Prosecutor’s Office also did not consider violations of the Law on the Army or the Constitution in the hiring of Colonel Veljko Mališić, who at the time was an active-duty military officer.  <figure> <img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260219200212_96f842ecf715a653d97866696828587a0c75cf936093c3d0a877597dacbd447c.jpg" data-media-id="editor_3" data-image-id="20260219200212_96f842ecf715a653d97866696828587a0c75cf936093c3d0a877597dacbd447c" data-rendition-name="original" width="259" height="194" loading="lazy" alt="IMA NEKA TAJNA VEZA: Novović, Mandić, Spajić"> <figcaption>THERE IS SOME SECRET CONNECTION: Novović, Mandić, Spajić(Photo: UGC )</figcaption> </figure>  <h2>„PLAYING IT SAFE“</h2> It is clear that legal reasons were not the key factor behind Vladimir Novović’s complete shift in conduct. The Chief Special Prosecutor faced an ultimatum from the top of the post-August government, primarily from Spajić’s Europe Now Movement: if he continued prosecuting officials from that party, he risked being removed from his position as head of the Special State Prosecutor’s Office. According to information obtained by Television E, some „friends from the West“ also warned Novović that it would be wise to wait before prosecuting officials of the new government and that the focus of the Special State Prosecutor’s Office should instead be on individuals from the former government led by the Democratic Party of Socialists. At the same time, he was allegedly threatened that irregularities from his time as a member of the Judicial Council’s Commission for the Evaluation of Judges would be pulled from the archives, specifically allegations that, by manipulating evaluation scores, together with Judge Vesna Vučković, he helped advance Judge Seka Piletić to the Supreme Court. Today it is quite clear that Vladimir Novović chose to remain at the head of the Special State Prosecutor’s Office, ready to do whatever is asked of him. And perhaps that is why he does not respond to numerous questions, including those concerning allegations that the Special Prosecutor’s Office is targeting all critically oriented media outlets.

Siniša Adamović

Draško Đuranović

By persecuting prosecutor Lidija Mitrović, Chief Special Prosecutor Vladimir Novović was saving his own position

Od apsolutne zaštite do apsolutnog progona. Tako izgleda odnos glavnog specijalnog tužioca Vladimira Novovića prema bivšoj specijalnoj tužiteljki Lidiji Mitrović, pravosnažno osuđenoj na sedam mjeseci zatvora, koja je danas u bjekstvu. &nbsp; Prije nepune četiri godine, Novović je glatko odbacio zahtjev tadašnje ministarke odbrane Olivere Injac koja je tvdila da je specijalna tužiteljka proganja iz osvete što Ministarstvo odbrane nije poslalo sina Lidije Mitrović na školovanje u vojnu akademiju ,,Ikaron” u Grčkoj. &nbsp;  <figure> <img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/2026021920024_a6344baeda8979aa7a1aaa70c3b5fa536d0b72f35a1b8df1130636261a07d986.png" data-media-id="editor_0" data-image-id="2026021920024_a6344baeda8979aa7a1aaa70c3b5fa536d0b72f35a1b8df1130636261a07d986" data-rendition-name="original" width="1600" height="1200" loading="lazy" alt="OD ZAŠTITE DO PROGONA, SAMO JE KORAK - POLITIKE: Lidija Mitrović i Vladimir Novović"> <figcaption>OD ZAŠTITE DO PROGONA, SAMO JE KORAK - POLITIKE: Lidija Mitrović i Vladimir Novović(Photo: Ilustracija: Balša PAVIĆEVIĆ)</figcaption> </figure>  TUŽILAČKA ZAŠTITA TUŽITELJKE MITROVIĆ Upravo 27. maja 2022. godine Vladimir Novović je glatko odbio zahtjev Olivere Injac. &nbsp; -Nakon izvršenog uvida u spise predmeta, te nakon pribavljenog izjašnjenja od strane specijalne tužiteljke Mitrović Lidije, utvrdio sam da je specijalna tužiteljka Lidija Mitrović službene radnje u navedenom predmetu preduzimala blagovremeno i zakonito – piše, između ostalog, u Rješenju glavnog specijalnog tužioca, uz napomenu da ,,ne postoji ni jedan od razloga za izuzeće specijalne tužiteljke”. Osim glavnog specijalnog tužioca I njegov vjerni zamjenik, specijalni tužilac Miloš Šoškić, direktno je Tužilačkom savjetu slao pohvalne ocjene za rad Lidije Mitrović. &nbsp;  <figure> <img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/2026021920028_40be344ef52ec362a0cabb71cdb9c20318a7662ff6a5df230b1d3b951487bf86.jpg" data-media-id="editor_1" data-image-id="2026021920028_40be344ef52ec362a0cabb71cdb9c20318a7662ff6a5df230b1d3b951487bf86" data-rendition-name="original" width="1920" height="1480" loading="lazy" alt="PIŠI KAKO TI JE NAREĐENO: Dopis Miloša Šoškića, zamjenika GST Novovića"> <figcaption>PIŠI KAKO TI JE NAREĐENO: Dopis Miloša Šoškića, zamjenika GST Novovića(Photo: Portal ETV )</figcaption> </figure>  -Nalazim da su navodi pritužbe ministarke odbrane Olivere Injac neosnovani, te da je specijalna tužiteljka Mitrović Lidija u predmetu Kt-S.br.63/21 preduzimanja radnje u cjelosti, shodno Zakonu o krivičnom postupku – zaključio je Šoškić. &nbsp;&nbsp; NOVOVIĆEV PREOKRET &nbsp; A onda su se – baš u cjelosti – sve radnje glavnog specijalnog tužioca i njegove ekipe iz SDT-a u potpunosti promijenile. Zaštićena specijalna tužiteljka Lidija Mitrović odjednom je postala meta progona svojih kolega. &nbsp; A do tada tužilački procesuirana Olivera Injac postala je, preko noći, specijalno zaštićena ličnost, za čiju ispravnost garantuju upravo glavni specijalni tužilac Vladimir Novović i njegova specijalna ekipa tužilaca. &nbsp; Bivša ministraka odbrane Olivera Injac uspjela je za trinaest mjeseci na čelu Ministarstva odbrane da sakupi čak četiri krivične prijave. &nbsp;  <figure> <img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/2026021920028_c2ca573b8a4b0c2964d25fca663463dd5ea4a27b67607f274fcd7106ca106be4.jpg" data-media-id="editor_2" data-image-id="2026021920028_c2ca573b8a4b0c2964d25fca663463dd5ea4a27b67607f274fcd7106ca106be4" data-rendition-name="original" width="916" height="515" loading="lazy" alt="ČETIRI KRIVIČNE PRIJAVE I - NIŠTA OD PROCESUIRANJA: Olivera Injac "> <figcaption>ČETIRI KRIVIČNE PRIJAVE I - NIŠTA OD PROCESUIRANJA: Olivera Injac(Photo: UGC )</figcaption> </figure>  ČETIRI PRIJAVE PROTIV MINISTARKE ODBRANE Prvom krivičnom prijavom, 23. marta 2021. godine, Olivera Injac se tereti za zloupotrebu službenog položaja, kada je zaposlila penzionisanog zastavnika Vojske Crne Gore Miodraga Jokanovića u Obavještajno-bezbjednosni direktorat Ministarstva odbrane Crne Gore. &nbsp; Druga prijava, 13. aprila 2021. godine takođe je podnešena zbog zloupotrebe službenog položaja ministarke Injac koja je, bez odluke Savjeta za odbranu i kršeći Zakon o Vojsci Crne Gore, angažovala u radni odnos aktivno vojno lice, potpukovnika Veljka Mališića. &nbsp; Zbog afere ,,kadeti“ i nezakonitog eliminisanja Marka Mitrovića, sina tužiteljke Mitrović da studira na vojnoj akademiji u Grčkoj napisana je treća krivična prijava protiv ministrake Injac. &nbsp; Četvrtu krivičnu prijavu je podnio oficir Igor Knežević, zbog ,,zloupotrebe položaja i ustavne diskriminacije koju je protiv njega sprovodila ministarka odbrane Olivera Injac“ ULTIMATUMI POLITIKE &nbsp; Glavni specijalni tužilac je, izdajući dva obavezujuća uputstva da se ne goni Olivera Injac, potpuno zaustavio procesuiranje svih ostalih krivičnih prijava. &nbsp; A pri tom se Novović upleo u objašnjavanje neobjašnivog. Pa je u obavezujućem uputstvu tvrdio da angažovanje penzionera Jokanovića u stalni radni odnos, i to bez stručnih referenci, u Obavještajno-bezbjednosni direktorat i nije bilo neko veliko kršenje zakona. &nbsp; Umjesto pravnih razloga, Novović je koristio ,,let kroz vrijeme”, pa je karikaturalno zaključio da Injac koja je zaposlila Jokanovića 1. februara 2021. godine, nije prekršila zakon iako je Jokanoviću obustavljena isplata penzije mjesec kasnije, pa je istovremeno primao i platu i penziju. &nbsp; Specijalno državno tužilaštvo nije razmatralo ni kršenje Zakona o vojsci i kršenje Ustava prilikom angažovanja u radni odnos u ministarstvu odbrane pukovnika Veljka Mališića, koji je tada bio – aktivno vojno lice. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  <figure> <img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260219200212_96f842ecf715a653d97866696828587a0c75cf936093c3d0a877597dacbd447c.jpg" data-media-id="editor_3" data-image-id="20260219200212_96f842ecf715a653d97866696828587a0c75cf936093c3d0a877597dacbd447c" data-rendition-name="original" width="259" height="194" loading="lazy" alt="IMA NEKA TAJNA VEZA: Novović, Mandić, Spajić"> <figcaption>IMA NEKA TAJNA VEZA: Novović, Mandić, Spajić(Photo: UGC )</figcaption> </figure>  &nbsp;,,IGRA NA SIGURNO” I jasno je: nijesu pravni razlozi bili ključni za potpunu promjenu postupanja Vladimira Novovića. Glavni specijalni tužilac imao je ultimatum iz vrha avgustovske vlasti, prvenstveno iz Spajićevog PES-a: ukoliko nastavi sa procesuiranjem funkcionera te partije – rizikuje da bude smijenen sa pozicije čalniak Specijalnog državnog tužiulaštva. &nbsp; Prema informacijama Televizije E, i neki ,,prijatelji sa Zapada” upozorii su Novovića da se valja sačekati sa procesuiranjem funkcionera nove vlasti i da bi fokus SDT-a valjalo da budu ljudi iz nekadašnje valsti koju je predvodila Demokratska partija socijalista. Istovremeno, zaprijećeno je da će se iz arhive izvaditi i Novovićeve nezakonitosti iz vremena kada je bio član Komisije Sudskog savjeta za ocjenjivanje sudija I kada je, friziranjem ocjena, zajedno sa sutkinjom Vesnom Vučković pogurao sudiju Seku Piletić u Vrhovni sud. &nbsp; Danas je sasvim jasno da je Vladimir Novović izabrao da ostene na čelu Specijalnog državnog tužilaštva, spreman da učini sve što se od njega traži. I ko zna, možda se zato ne oglašava na brojna pitanja, poput onih o tome da Specijalno tužilaštvo targetira sve kritički anstrojene medije. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;

Progonom tužiteljke Lidije Mitrović, glavni specijalni tužilac Vladimir Novović spašavao svoju fotelju

By analyzing indictments and orders to conduct investigations, ETV’s investigative team revealed disturbing irregularities in cases handled by the Special State Prosecutor’s Office more than a month ago, pointing to possible abuses. As reported by Television E and Portal ETV, as many as twelve SKY messages of identical content, date, and time were inserted into a case concerning cigarette smuggling through the Ecuadorian port of Guayaquil, while simultaneously appearing in an investigation into cocaine smuggling, also from Ecuador?!  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218190232_e64d0cc2def2a2b91ae1ed3329c2892f6aca08b81420f8bf5d687fdd0cecbd26.jpg" data-media-id="editor_0" data-image-id="20260218190232_e64d0cc2def2a2b91ae1ed3329c2892f6aca08b81420f8bf5d687fdd0cecbd26" data-rendition-name="original" width="1632" height="1080" loading="lazy" alt="SUMNJA NA TUŽILAČKE MANIPULACIJE: Dvanaest istih rečenica u tri tužilačka akta i dvije istrage "><figcaption>SUSPICION OF PROSECUTORIAL MANIPULATION: Twelve identical sentences in three prosecutorial acts and two investigations(Photo: Portal ETV)</figcaption></figure>  <h2>NO REACTION FROM THE SSPO</h2> Journalists from our media outlet also uncovered manipulation of the content of a Europol Intelligence Document delivered to Predrag Šuković, head of the Special Police Department, and from there forwarded to the head of the Special State Prosecutor’s Office Vladimir Novović.  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218190228_5c0df89e1879ca62767f2aad2ee6f54a61386ab33874017a65d540a424532ed0.jpg" data-media-id="editor_1" data-image-id="20260218190228_5c0df89e1879ca62767f2aad2ee6f54a61386ab33874017a65d540a424532ed0" data-rendition-name="original" width="1200" height="900" loading="lazy" alt="BEZ ODGOVORA: Vladimir novović, glavni specijalni tužilac "><figcaption>NO ANSWER: Vladimir novović, Chief Special Prosecutor(Photo: FOTO: SAVO PRELEVIC)prelevics@t-com.me</figcaption></figure>  What is particularly intriguing is that the original Europol documents do not mention the name of Podgorica businessman Aleksandar Mijajlović, nor the nickname „Aco“, which later mysteriously appears in prosecutorial files, replacing Europol’s information about a person nicknamed „Miki“ and „New Miki“ (translated from „Novi Miki“).  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218190232_dca24f3c0e07eea046161fa248c4130ebf699626652f27da389338de94f47965.png" data-media-id="editor_2" data-image-id="20260218190232_dca24f3c0e07eea046161fa248c4130ebf699626652f27da389338de94f47965" data-rendition-name="original" width="1250" height="600" loading="lazy" alt="NA METI SDT-A: Biznismen Aleksandar Mijajlović"><figcaption>TARGETED BY THE SSPO: Businessman Aleksandar Mijajlović(Photo: Portal ETV)</figcaption></figure>  All of this raises suspicion that someone - either within the Special Police Department or the Special State Prosecutor’s Office - subsequently altered or supplemented the original Europol data. However, apart from persistent silence lasting more than a month, there has been no reaction from the Special State Prosecutor’s Office to Television E’s questions. Nor did Supreme State Prosecutor Milorad Marković answer the key question: he responded to four questions with a single sentence.  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218190228_095225006df61443760e25e8eb49a816ad49cb44242b2cab6d702fe8c7aa8f7f.jpg" data-media-id="editor_3" data-image-id="20260218190228_095225006df61443760e25e8eb49a816ad49cb44242b2cab6d702fe8c7aa8f7f" data-rendition-name="original" width="843" height="527" loading="lazy" alt="JEDNA REČENICA ZA ČETIRI PITANJA: Milorad Marković, vrhovni državni tužilac "><figcaption>ONE SENTENCE FOR FOUR QUESTIONS: Milorad Marković, Supreme State Prosecutor(Photo: UGC )</figcaption></figure>  <h2> WHEN AN ANSWER IS NOT AN ANSWER</h2> - We remind you that the cases you mention in your questions are pending before the competent court. All proposed evidence, including the cited messages, will be assessed by the court in accordance with the law, and a decision will be made - the office of the Supreme State Prosecutor Marković replied. In reality: one bureaucratically worded sentence, devoid of substance! Even after a follow-up email - in which we reiterated that the same messages appear as evidence in multiple cases, one of which is still under investigation by the Special Prosecutor’s Office - no response was provided. While prosecutors largely remain silent, the President of the Supreme Court of Montenegro Valentina Pavličić submitted a detailed written response, citing the Constitution and laws. She recalled that judicial authority is independent, and that judges are autonomous in exercising their judicial function and rule exclusively on the basis of the Constitution and the law, which excludes any interference in judicial decision-making in specific cases.  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218190232_725909ed3b16afae9f7dc02777b55e69b264c9b7d8e9c548024ce2e9306ad1b1.webp" data-media-id="editor_4" data-image-id="20260218190232_725909ed3b16afae9f7dc02777b55e69b264c9b7d8e9c548024ce2e9306ad1b1" data-rendition-name="original" width="1920" height="1081" loading="lazy" alt="POŠTOVANJE USTAVA I ZAKONA: Valentina Pavličić, predsjednica Vrhovnog suda Crne Gore "><figcaption>RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION AND THE LAW: Valentina Pavličić, President of the Supreme Court of Montenegro(Photo: UGC)</figcaption></figure>  <h2> LACK OF JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT</h2> - The President of the Supreme Court of Montenegro has no authority to act or in any way influence individual cases pending before Montenegrin courts - Pavličić’s response states. She emphasized that, in order to preserve the integrity of proceedings and impartiality, she has no legal authority to comment on individual cases. - The President of the Supreme Court of Montenegro also has no legal authority to review confirmed indictments, analyze individual cases, or assess the admissibility of evidence in court proceedings before lower courts. The assessment of evidence and the rendering of decisions based on evidence presented in court proceedings fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of judicial panels before which the cases are pending - the response to Television E states. <h2>QUESTIONS BLOWN „INTO THE WIND“</h2> Will you request that the indictments in question be reviewed again? Do you believe that such conduct may have violated the defendants’ right to a fair trial, both by the Special State Prosecutor’s Office and by the judges who confirmed the indictments? To these questions from TV E, the President of the High Court in Podgorica Zoran Radović persistently avoided responding. Unlike Montenegrin institutions, which remain silent on questions about the misuse of SKY communications, lawyers across Europe have for years warned that SKY cannot serve as valid evidence if its authenticity is disputed.  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218190236_7e57ab71347f7414294dab5c5879e462d39108ea8dd24fa124db4e829ea38a4e.jpg" data-media-id="editor_5" data-image-id="20260218190236_7e57ab71347f7414294dab5c5879e462d39108ea8dd24fa124db4e829ea38a4e" data-rendition-name="original" width="1406" height="1080" loading="lazy" alt="MORA POSTOJATI MOGUĆNOST ADVOKATA DA PROVJERE SKAJ DOKAZE: Justus Reizinger "><figcaption>DEFENSE LAWYERS MUST HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO VERIFY SKY EVIDENCE: Justus Reizinger(Photo: Portal ETV)</figcaption></figure>  <h2>THE QUESTION OF TRIAL FAIRNESS</h2> Dutch lawyer Justus Reizinger emphasizes that the defense must have full opportunity to verify the legality of how such evidence was obtained. - As defense attorneys in criminal proceedings, we must be able not only to verify the reliability of incriminating evidence, but also to determine how it was obtained and processed, whether this was done in accordance with the law, and whether it constitutes lawful evidence at all - Reizinger said in a statement to ETV. He stresses that this must be assessed in accordance with the national legislation of the states from which the citizens indicted on the basis of SKY messages originate. - We must be able to examine legality in accordance with the national legislation of all states involved. If these questions of legality cannot be adequately reviewed, that means there is no possibility of a fair trial, and such evidence would have to be excluded - Reizinger concludes. While competent institutions shift responsibility among themselves, the key question remains unanswered: were the disputed evidence lawfully obtained and used? State silence and the absence of reaction call into question the defendants’ right to a fair trial, and at the same time undermine public trust in the judicial system.

Svetlana Đokić

A wall of state silence over manipulations of SKY evidence

„The indictment has not been sent, there’s no time for that today, and the Chief Novović has to review it, he will do so over the weekend“. „OK, this will finally be finished“. That is what Special Prosecutor Lidija Mitrović thought after her colleague, Special Prosecutor Zoran Vučinić, informed her via WhatsApp messages that the leadership of the Special Prosecutor’s Office had received information that on Thursday, November 24, 2022, Mitrović had submitted to the registry office of the Special State Prosecutor’s Office an indictment against Minister of Defense Olivera Injac for abuse of office. <h2>A LONG JOURNEY</h2> This came after a grueling investigation that lasted more than a year and a half, starting from the first criminal complaints filed against the Minister of Defense in March and April 2021 by attorney Mihailo Volkov.  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218180224_307cd2849285f1ed617c9fd82c88c2a8dc7a10adeac0c4621bc7d1f4c45cab00.jpg" data-media-id="editor_0" data-image-id="20260218180224_307cd2849285f1ed617c9fd82c88c2a8dc7a10adeac0c4621bc7d1f4c45cab00" data-rendition-name="original" width="275" height="183" loading="lazy" alt="Olivera Injac"><figcaption>POLITICS AS SALVATION: Olivera Injac, former Minister of Defense, now diplomatic representative in Brussels(Photo: UGC)</figcaption></figure>  In the meantime, Minister Injac used her position to avoid summons for questioning: as a suspect, she appeared for the first time only on August 24, 2021, four months after receiving a call from the Special Prosecutor’s Office. However, Injac then began further delaying tactics and was questioned as a suspect for the second time only on August 10, 2022, a year after her first appearance at the SSPO. That is why Mitrović perceived the message from her colleague Vučinić as an announcement that the investigative phase was over and that the indictment against Injac would be forwarded for confirmation to the High Court. However, nothing was finished, nor did events unfold as Prosecutor Mitrović had imagined.  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218180224_7379e9d5546be0add678b94b22231e7f112d0ac5de48bc88598f90fe896542b4.jpg" data-media-id="editor_1" data-image-id="20260218180224_7379e9d5546be0add678b94b22231e7f112d0ac5de48bc88598f90fe896542b4" data-rendition-name="original" width="2050" height="712" loading="lazy" alt="SMS notifications from Mitrović that Novović is needed"><figcaption>A CALL THAT CANNOT BE REFUSED: SMS notification to Mitrović that Novović needs her(Photo: Portal ETV)</figcaption></figure>  <h2>„A MESSAGE FROM THE BOSS“</h2> Just as she entered a hall for a one-day legal seminar in Podgorica, the Special State Prosecutor received an SMS message from the secretary of Chief Special Prosecutor Vladimir Novović: „Prosecutor, on Wednesday you are to come to the Boss,“ the secretary wrote. When Mitrović asked why she needed to report in seven days, the secretary bluntly replied: „That’s what he said“. When she returned to her office around 3 p.m. that day, Mitrović realized she had been under special treatment - that the team around the Chief Special Prosecutor had very closely monitored her movements. And for a strong reason: so that, in Lidija Mitrović’s absence, Chief Special Prosecutor Vladimir Novović could order Special Prosecutor Jovan Vukotić to carry out a special operation: the urgent seizure of the indictment against Olivera Injac, all copies, and all accompanying files from the special prosecutor’s office. <h2>THE SEIZURE OF THE INDICTMENT AND FILES</h2> Lidija Mitrović described this precisely in the Official Memorandum dated November 24.  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218180240_39a0bf1947675d801678756f9bf7cdb3970c9a12b1606a05685f2f04fba3ed66.jpg" data-media-id="editor_2" data-image-id="20260218180240_39a0bf1947675d801678756f9bf7cdb3970c9a12b1606a05685f2f04fba3ed66" data-rendition-name="original" width="1920" height="1128" loading="lazy" alt="PROOF OF ILLEGAL CONDUCT OF NOVOVIĆ: Part of the official memorandum of Lidija Mitrović"><figcaption>PROOF OF ILLEGAL CONDUCT OF NOVOVIĆ: Part of the official memorandum of Lidija Mitrović(Photo: Portal ETV)</figcaption></figure>  - When I returned from the seminar to my office at 3 p.m., my colleague Milijana informed me that colleague Jovan Vukotić had come on the order of Chief Special Prosecutor Novović and requested that the case files concerning Olivera Injac be immediately handed over to him, after which she handed them to him without notifying or in the presence of the acting prosecutor. Upon learning this, I called Vukotić and told him that he could neither take nor request files for which I am responsible without my presence - Mitrović recorded, among other things, in the Official Memorandum. The contents of the memorandum leave no doubt that the action of Special Prosecutor Jovan Vukotić - the seizure of the indictment and case files in the Olivera Injac case — was carried out on the personal order of Vladimir Novović. And all of this without prior notification and without Mitrović’s consent?! Since the establishment of the Special State Prosecutor’s Office for Organized Crime in 2015, such conduct by a Chief Special Prosecutor had not been recorded.  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218180240_40be344ef52ec362a0cabb71cdb9c20318a7662ff6a5df230b1d3b951487bf86.jpg" data-media-id="editor_3" data-image-id="20260218180240_40be344ef52ec362a0cabb71cdb9c20318a7662ff6a5df230b1d3b951487bf86" data-rendition-name="original" width="1920" height="1480" loading="lazy" alt="PROOF OF FORMER SUPPORT FOR THE WORK OF LIDIJA MITROVIĆ: Letter from SDT signed by Miloš Šoškić"><figcaption>PROOF OF FORMER SUPPORT FOR THE WORK OF LIDIJA MITROVIĆ: Letter from SDT signed by Miloš Šoškić(Photo: Portal ETV)</figcaption></figure>  Nor then, nor later, was there any explanation why, until November 24, Chief Special Prosecutor Vladimir Novović and the team of special prosecutors had fully supported, protected, and publicly respected the work of Special Prosecutor Lidija Mitrović. <h2>PERSONA NON GRATA</h2> And then, literally overnight, Prosecutor Mitrović became persona non grata within the SSPO, and soon the target of persecution. The support that the SSPO had provided to Mitrović, and the rejection of numerous initiatives by Minister Injac, is evidenced by documents from the Special State Prosecutor’s Office published by Television E. Thus, on April 22, 2022, Special Prosecutor Zoran Vučinić dismissed as unfounded a complaint filed by Minister Olivera Injac against Special Prosecutor Lidija Mitrović. Then, on May 27, Chief Special Prosecutor Vladimir Novović rejected Olivera Injac’s request for the disqualification of Prosecutor Lidija Mitrović. On June 28 of the same year, Deputy Chief Special Prosecutor Miloš Šoškić informed the Prosecutorial Council that Prosecutor Lidija Mitrović had undertaken actions „fully in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code“. And just one day before Mitrović submitted the indictment against Olivera Injac to the SSPO registry, on November 23, 2022, the then President of the Prosecutorial Council, Maja Jovanović, informed the Special Prosecutor’s Office that „the Prosecutorial Council assessed the complaints against Prosecutor Lidija Mitrović as unfounded“. What, then, happened during the night between Wednesday, November 23, and Thursday, November 24? Why did a complete turnaround occur, including the forceful seizure of the indictment against Olivera Injac, and later Novović’s fierce persecution of Prosecutor Mitrović?  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218180240_9e3e5f8e17197e16c7cc6bc6d483d02f41b856a6d990920428812b7c438d0c4a.jpg" data-media-id="editor_4" data-image-id="20260218180240_9e3e5f8e17197e16c7cc6bc6d483d02f41b856a6d990920428812b7c438d0c4a" data-rendition-name="original" width="1920" height="1480" loading="lazy" alt="THE FINAL BLOW AGAINST MITROVIĆ: One of two binding instructions from Vladimir Novović"><figcaption>THE FINAL BLOW AGAINST MITROVIĆ: One of two binding instructions from Vladimir Novović(Photo: Portal ETV)</figcaption></figure>  <h2>A MANDATORY POLITICAL INSTRUCTION</h2> Evidently, the Chief Special Prosecutor received from the top of government a „binding political instruction“, that well-known call „that changes everything“. In short: Olivera Injac had to be protected from prosecution at all costs - if the Chief Special Prosecutor wanted to retain the support of the parliamentary majority. - Although Zdravko Krivokapić’s government had fallen, Olivera Injac had the support of the parliamentary majority, as well as of the leadership of the Serbian Church in Montenegro, which had and still has strong influence over the ruling elite - explains an ETV source from the security sector, well informed about the background of certain moves, not only in politics. According to this assessment, Novović’s position primarily depended on the support that the parliamentary majority, whose real leader is Andrija Mandić, could secure for him through Parliament, the Prosecutorial Council, and the leadership of the judiciary. - At the same time, protection for Novović was guaranteed by Milojko Spajić, whose Europe Now Movement (Pokret Evropa sad) party advocated that Olivera Injac must not be prosecuted and that she had already been earmarked for a position in Montenegrin diplomacy - the ETV interlocutor emphasizes. After becoming absolutely certain of political support, the Chief Special Prosecutor in the following months launched a fierce campaign to challenge the work of Lidija Mitrović. <h2>DIVERGING PATHS</h2> Thus, on December 1, 2022, only seven days after seizing the indictment and case files, Novović issued a binding instruction to Prosecutor Mitrović that she must not prosecute Olivera Injac. Several months later, and only days before Olivera Injac was to be elected Mayor of Podgorica, on April 6, 2023, a new binding instruction followed. Never before, during twenty years of the SSPO’s existence, had any Chief Special Prosecutor issued two binding instructions. And, of course, there was again no reaction from the Prosecutorial Council.  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218180244_f89980bc0656ea5fd996a2d7a980e23aab307781b93089f008b56a67e1124962.jpg" data-media-id="editor_5" data-image-id="20260218180244_f89980bc0656ea5fd996a2d7a980e23aab307781b93089f008b56a67e1124962" data-rendition-name="original" width="1200" height="800" loading="lazy" alt="DIFFICULT ROAD TO JUSTICE: Fugitive prosecutor Mitrović"><figcaption>DIFFICULT ROAD TO JUSTICE: Fugitive prosecutor Mitrović(Photo: UGC)</figcaption></figure>  By then it was clear that the paths of Olivera Injac and Lidija Mitrović would no longer cross, that the Europe Now Movement official would advance, while the special prosecutor would come under pressure. Their destinies are now entirely different: former Minister of Defense Olivera Injac is on a diplomatic mission in Brussels, while the former special prosecutor, now finally convicted, is somewhere far away - on the run. In the coming days, our media outlet will present further documents to the public showing how the Chief Special Prosecutor acted and what means he used to rid himself of the „undesirable“ figures within the Special State Prosecutor’s Office.

„The Lidija Mitrović Case“: From Novović’s protection to Novović’s persecution

Skoro polovina svjetske populacije živjeće u uslovima ekstremne vrućine do 2050. godine ako globalno zagrijavanje dostigne dva stepena Celzijusa iznad predindustrijskih nivoa, a to je scenario koji klimatski naučnici smatraju sve vjerovatnijim.
Naučnici sa Univerziteta u Oksfordu upozoravaju da će se većina posljedica osjetiti ranije, kako svijet premašuje cilj od 1,5°C postavljen Pariškim sporazumom, prenosi Energetski portal. U studiji koja je objavljena u časopisu Nature Sustainability, navodi se da će 41 odsto svjetske populacije živjeti u uslovima esktremne vrućine.
Predviđa se da će Centralnoafrička Republika, Nigerija, Južni Sudan, Laos i Brazil doživjeti najznačajnije poraste opasno visokih temperatura, dok će najveće pogođene populacije biti u Indiji, Nigeriji, Indoneziji, Bangladešu, Pakistanu i Filipinima.
Zemlje sa hladnijom klimom doživjeće znatno veće relativne promjene u broju neprijatnih vrućih dana, u nekim slučajevima više nego dvostruko.
U poređenju sa periodom od 2006. do 2016, kada je globalni prosjek porasta temperature dostigao stepen Celzijusa iznad predindustrijskih nivoa, studija pokazuje da bi zagrijavanje do dva stepena dovelo do dvostrukog povećanja u Austriji i Kanadi, 150 odsto u Ujedinjenom Kraljevstvu, Švedskoj i Finskoj, 200 odsto u Norveškoj, kao i 230 odsto u Irskoj.
S obzirom na to da su izgrađeno okruženje i infrastruktura u ovim zemljama prvenstveno dizajnirani za hladne uslove, čak i umjereni porast temperature vjerovatno će imati disproporcionalno teške posljedice u poređenju sa regionima koji imaju veće resurse i kapacitete prilagođavanja.
Predviđeni porast ekstremne vrućine dovešće do značajnog rasta potražnje za energijom za sisteme hlađenja i odgovarajućih emisija, dok će potražnja za grijanjem u zemljama poput Kanade i Švajcarske opadati.
- Naša studija pokazuje da većina promjena u potražnji za hlađenjem i grijanjem nastaje prije dostizanja praga od 1,5 °C, što znači da će mnoge kuće možda trebati klima-uređaje u narednih pet godina, ali će temperature nastaviti rasti dugo nakon toga ako dostignemo 2°C globalnog zagrijavanja. Da bi se postigao globalni cilj neto-nula emisija ugljenika do 2050. godine, moramo dekarbonizovati sektor zgrada i razviti efikasnije i otpornije adaptacione strategije - ističe Hehsus Lesana, glavni autor studije.

Prognoza klimatskih naučnika: Do 2050. skoro polovina svijeta biće suočena sa ekstremnom vrućinom

Interaktivna služba u Drezgi ponovo je počela sa radom početkom februara, a trenutno je u proces rada uključeno šestoro djece, saopšteno je iz Ministarstva prosvjete, nauke i inovacija.
Program se realizuje prema utvrđenom rasporedu, tri puta nedjeljno, po dva sata i 30 minuta.
- Interaktivne službe se organizuju pri predškolskim ustanovama i predstavljaju usluge namjenjene za djecu koja žive u udaljenim seoskim područjima, u kojima ne postoji vaspitno- obazovna ustanova - navodi se u saopštenju.

MPNI: Ponovo radi interaktivna služba na Drezgi

Američki predsjednik Donald Tramp ponovo je izazvao burne reakcije javnosti nakon objave na društvenim mrežama u kojoj najavljuje slanje "velikog bolničkog broda" na Grenland.
Iako je Tramp ovu odluku predstavio kao grandiozan humanitarni potez, činjenice ukazuju na to da je riječ o neviđenom cinizmu, obmanjivanju javnosti i potpunoj neistini.
Sve je počelo nakon što se jedan mornar na američkoj nuklearnoj podmornici, čije je prisustvo u blizini Grenlanda već samo po sebi provokativno s obzirom na geopolitički kontekst, iznenada razbolio. Danske vojne snage, tačnije Zajednička arktička komanda, brzo su reagovale. Uspješno su evakuisale američkog mornara s podmornice, sedam nautičkih milja od glavnog grada Nuuka, i smjestile ga na liječenje u bolnicu na Grenlandu.
Umjesto da, kako bi se i očekivalo, uputi riječi zahvale danskim vlastima za spašavanje američkog vojnika, Tramp je odlučio iskoristiti ovu situaciju za novu provokaciju i omalovažavanje.
Tramp je na društvenim mrežama objavio da sarađuje s guvernerom američke savezne države Luizijana Džefom Lendrijem kako bi poslali pomoć na ovu dansku teritoriju.
- Radeći sa fantastičnim guvernerom Luizijane Džefom Lendrijem poslaćemo veliki bolnički brod na Grenland kako bismo se pobrinuli za mnoge bolesne ljude o kojima se tamo niko ne brine. Brod je na putu -napisao je Tramp neposredno prije večere s republikanskim guvernerima u Bijeloj kući.
Tvrdnja američkog predsjednika da je brod "na putu" i da stiže iz Luizijane je u potpunosti netačna. Američka mornarica raspolaže s ukupno dva bolnička broda, USNS Mercy i USNS Comfort. Niti jedan od njih nije stacioniran u Luizijani, a ono što priču čini još apsurdnijom jeste činjenica da su oba broda trenutno van funkcije.
Prema pisanju specijalizovanih portala, oba broda se nalaze na održavanju u brodogradilištu u Alabami. Samim tim, nikakav "veliki bolnički brod" fizički ne može ploviti prema Grenlandu.
Bijela kuća, kabinet guvernera Lendrija, kao ni nadležna ministarstva nisu odgovarali na upite medija o tome da li su Danska ili Grenland uopšte tražili ovakvu pomoć, na koje bolesne ljude je Tramp mislio, niti kakve veze guverner Luizijane ima s ovim pitanjem.
<h2>Tenzije oko kupovine Grenlanda</h2>
Podsjetimo, Tramp već duže vrijeme otvoreno izražava želju da Sjedinjene Američke Države jednostavno kupe Grenland od Danske, što je izazvalo višemjesečne trzavice unutar NATO saveza.
Da bi demonstrirao suverenitet i jedinstvo sa ovom teritorijom usljed Trampovih pritisaka, danski kralj Frederik je prošle sedmice po drugi put u godini dana posjetio Grenland.
Kritičari i analitičari poput Arnoda Bertranda ovaj Trampov potez ocjenjuju kao vrhunac cinizma. Umjesto da bude zahvalan zemlji koja je domaćin spasilačkoj misiji njegovog vojnika, američki predsjednik je iskoristio priliku da neutemeljeno kritikuje zdravstveni sistem Grenlanda najavljujući fiktivnu pomoć koja ne postoji.

Nevjerovatan cinizam: Umjesto zahvale Danskoj za spašenog mornara, Tramp izmislio slanje "bolničkog broda" na Grenland

Ministar spoljnih poslova Mađarske Peter Sijarto objavio je danas da će njegova zemlja blokirati pokušaj Evropske unije (EU) da usvoji 20. paket sankcija protiv Rusije, kao i da će zaustaviti napore za dopremanje dalje pomoći Ukrajini.
- Na sjutrašnjem Savjetu za spoljne poslove, EU ima za cilj da usvoji 20. paket sankcija. Mađarska će ga blokirati. Dok Ukrajina ne nastavi tranzit nafte do Mađarske i Slovačke preko cjevovoda Družba, nećemo dozvoliti da se donose odluke važne za Kijev - napisao je Sijarto u objavi na Iksu (X).
Sijarto je dodao da će Mađarska takođe blokirati veliki zajam EU Ukrajini od 90 milijardi eura, koji bi trebalo da namiri vojne i ekonomske potrebe Kijeva u naredne dvije godine.
Ranije ove nedjelje, Mađarska i Slovačka su objavile da će obustaviti isporuke dizela Ukrajini zbog prekida u isporuci nafte.
Premijer Slovačke Robert Fico rekao je juče da će njegova zemlja prekinuti hitne isporuke električne energije Ukrajini ako se isporuke nafte ne obnove do sjutra.

Tag: specijalno-drzavno-tuzilastvo