Vjekoslav Lambulić kategorično je u Višem sudu negirao navode optužnice koja ga tereti da je učestvovao u švercu 2,5 tone kokaina i ustvrdio da su skaj poruke na kojima se temelji optužbe protiv njega objavljenje na TikToku davdeset dana prije nego su iz Francuske dostavljenje SDT-u i njegovim advokatima.
- Navodni pin koji sam ja koristio poslat je Francuskoj 27. aprila 2023. godine, odgovor je stigao SDT-u 19. decembra a ja sam uhapšen 8. oktobra 2023. godine. Te moje navodne poruke su već 27. novembra bile na TikToku. Objavio ih je Edmond Mustafa. Postavljam pitanje, kako su te poruke došle do Edmonda Mustafe prije nego do SDT-a. Izgleda da je Francuska više vjerovala Mustafi nego SDT-u - rekao je Lambulić u odbrani.
Istakao je da se optužnica protiv njega temelji jedino na navodnom dokazu - skaj komunikacijama.
Specijalno državno tužilaštvo u ovom predmetu koji je u javnosti poznat kao General označilo je Vasa Ulića ali i Radoja Zvicera i Slobodana Kašćelana, koji prema evidenciji bezbjednosnih službi slove za vođe kavačkog kriminalnog klana da su organizovali grupu čiji članovi su postali još 17 optuženih te i da su švercovali skoro 2,5 tone kokaina iz Južne Amerike u Evropu i Australiju.
Na optužnici osim njih i Lambulića su i Ulićev sin, Nikola, Vukan Čoković Matić, Viktor Drešaj, Radomir Dobriša, Petar Miranović, Marinko Prelević, Veselin-Paro Pavličić i Mileta Božović, zatim, Vuk Vulević, Radule Božović, Ivan Delić, Leon Drešaj i Dragan Pavličević. Na optuženičkoj klupi su i bivši predsjednik Opštine Budva Milo Božović, zatim, Vjekoslav Lambulić i Radovan Pantović.
Lambulić je bio decidan da nikada nije koristio skaj, niti je pronađen kod njega.
U nastavku odbrane bivši predsjednik opštine Budva Milo Božović ponovio je da su poruke ranije objavljene u medijima, prije nego što su kao dokaz dostavljene njegovim braniocima.
Božović je naglasio da poruke dokazuju da ih on nije pisao, jer su napisane na ekavici.
-Ne koristim ekavicu, već ijekavicu. Jasno je da ove poruke nijesam pisao - kazao je Božović.
Govoreći o trećem čatu, koji se, prema optužnici, odnosi na njegovo navodno vlasništvo nad pet kilograma droge, Božović je istakao da se radi o komunikaciji sa Petrom Miranovićem, koja ima 73 poruke.
- Navodno je 71 poruku napisao Petar Miranović, a dvije ja. Te dvije poruke glase: „OK, OK“ i „Samo važi, brate“. One ne mogu biti dokaz da sam vlasnik pet kilograma droge, niti da sam ih ja napisao - rekao je Božović.
On je dodao da u toj komunikaciji nema poruka o njegovom vrbovanju, nema dogovora o predaji droge, nema cijene, nema pominjanja trećih lica niti bilo kakvog pominjanja droge.
- Ne postoji nijedna poruka koja bi dokazala da sam bio član organizovane kriminalne grupe ili vlasnik bilo koje količine droge - naglasio je Božović.
On je naveo i da nikada nije koristio SKY ili bilo koju drugu kriptovanu aplikaciju.
I Petar Miranović je kazao da ne priznaje krivicu i da nikada nije bio član kriminalne organizacije, niti je prenosio ili prodavao drogu.
Radovan Pantović je takođe negirao krivicu i ukazao sudu da su protiv njega na osnovu istog navodnog Sky materijala podignute tri optužnice. Takođe, Marinko Prelević osporio je i činjenični opis i pravnu kvalifikaciju optužnice.

Marija Žižić

original

viewImage

baseImage

610x380

500x500

400x240

400x203

thumbnail

Lambulić: Skaj poruke objavljene na TikToku, pa onda dostavljene Tužilaštvu

One court, one case, two opposing decisions. What is rare in a state governed by the rule of law happened at the Court of Appeal of Montenegro, specifically in the case of Special Prosecutor Lidija Mitrović.
In May 2023, the Special State Prosecutor’s Office charged Special Prosecutor Mitrović with abuse of office, alleging that she had dismissed criminal complaints against three individuals suspected of tax evasion. As she stated in her testimony, Mitrović decided to abandon criminal prosecution after the suspects, following a formal warning, paid their outstanding tax obligations to the state.
<h2>The road to (in)justice</h2>
Everything that followed unfolded at a speed unfamiliar to the Montenegrin judiciary. Just six months after the indictment, on November 2nd of 2023, the High Court in Podgorica sentenced Special Prosecutor Mitrović to seven months in prison.
Appeals were filed against the judgment by Mitrović’s defense counsel, attorney Zoran Piperović, the Special State Prosecutor’s Office, and by Lidija Mitrović herself. She argued that the High Court had committed serious violations of criminal procedure, incorrectly established the facts, and that the prison sentence violated the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
On April 18th of 2024, a panel of the Court of Appeal composed of judges Vesna Moštrokol, Srđan Vujović and Dragoje Jović, overturned the High Court’s judgment.
<h2>Two decisions by the same court</h2>
- The first-instance court clearly committed a serious violation of the provisions of criminal procedure under points 8 and 9 of paragraph 1 of Article 386 of the Criminal Procedure Code… Due to these serious violations, it was necessary to overturn the first-instance judgment and return the case for retrial - the Court of Appeal stated, among other things, in its reasoning.
The decision of the Court of Appeal did not deter the judges of the High Court. Evidently, there was a particular interest in ensuring that Special Prosecutor Mitrović received „special treatment“. The High Court acted swiftly once again: in December 2024, it again sentenced Mitrović to seven months in prison for abuse of office.
Once again, appeals were filed with the Court of Appeal. Once again, a panel of the Court of Appeal convened, this time in a different composition: Presiding Judge Predrag Tabaš, with judges Zorica Milanović and Vesna Moštrokol as members.
A different panel resulted in a different decision. By a judgment dated May 6th of 2025, the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court’s ruling, rendering it final and enforceable.
- The appeals filed by the Special State Prosecutor’s Office, the defendant Lidija Mitrović, and the defendant’s counsel are dismissed as unfounded, and the judgment of the High Court in Podgorica, Special Department Ks.br. 26/24 of 23 December 2024, is upheld - the operative part of the Court of Appeal’s judgment states.
<h2>Constitutional appeal</h2>
That politics lies behind everything is what the dismissed prosecutor Mitrović claims in her constitutional appeal submitted to the Constitutional Court. In the document dated June 27th of 2025, citing the Constitution of Montenegro and the European Convention on Human Rights, she requests the adoption of an interim measure, namely - the suspension of the execution of the prison sentence.
The request is primarily based on alleged violations of the right to a fair trial, the right to an effective legal remedy, the right to work, and the presumption of innocence.
In her submission, Mitrović states that the proceedings against her and the High Court’s judgment were motivated by a single goal - to remove her from the position of special prosecutor, as she emphasized in her filing from July of this year.
<h2>The role of Vladimir Novović</h2>
The story of political influence on the position of Special Prosecutor Lidija Mitrović is not new. On the contrary, information available to Television E indicates that the rulings of the High Court and the Court of Appeal represent only the final phase of a carefully planned, politically motivated persecution.
Previously, the central role in the political elimination of Lidija Mitrović was played by Chief Special Prosecutor Vladimir Novović. In an effort to protect at all costs a political official of the Europe Now Movement - then Mayor of Podgorica - Novović issued two binding instructions to Special Prosecutor Lidija Mitrović. On both occasions, he ordered that Mitrović must not prosecute Olivera Injac, an official of the Europe Now Movement.
The first binding instruction - aimed at preventing the filing of an indictment proposal against Olivera Injac based on complaints submitted by attorney Mihailo Volkov for abuse of office and illegal employment - was issued in December 2022. The second followed in April 2023, just one day before Injac was elected Mayor of Podgorica.
The Chief Special Prosecutor ordered the acting prosecutor Lidija Mitrović to withdraw an indictment that had already been filed and officially registered with the prosecution’s registry.
<h2>Two binding instructions?!</h2>
The day after the indictment was „submitted“ to the registry of the Special State Prosecutor’s Office - while Prosecutor Mitrović was out of the office - all documents and case files disappeared, together with the binders.
In the same „Injac case“, Special Prosecutor Novović issued binding instructions twice, an unprecedented occurrence since the establishment of the Special State Prosecutor’s Office in 2015.
In addition to the extraordinary and evidently politically motivated actions of Chief Special Prosecutor Vladimir Novović, the fact that Lidija Mitrović is under special treatment by state institutions is further demonstrated by the months-long silence of the Constitutional Court.
Although Mitrović submitted her constitutional appeal as early as July 28th - together with a request for an interim measure - there has been no decision by the Constitutional Court to date, nor even a session held on the matter.
<h2>The „silence“ of the Constitutional Court</h2>
Prominent Montenegrin attorney Veselin Radulović assesses that differing decisions of the Court of Appeal do not necessarily justify a conclusion that the proceedings were politically motivated.
However, he emphasizes that the lack of response from the Constitutional Court is concerning and sends a negative message to citizens.
- We have seen that in this case, former Special State Prosecutor Lidija Mitrović submitted a constitutional appeal with a request to suspend the execution of the criminal judgment back in late July. And there is still no decision. These are cases in which the Constitutional Court should act as a matter of priority. When a timely response is absent, it certainly does not contribute to trust in the work of the Constitutional Court, nor does it enhance legal certainty for the citizens of Montenegro - Radulović told Television E.
Our media outlets received no response from the Constitutional Court, leaving it unclear when or whether the Constitutional Court panel will consider Lidija Mitrović’s constitutional appeal.
It would be useful if legal experts could, in the meantime, clarify the background of the Lidija Mitrović case. More precisely, to explain one paradox: how a special prosecutor, whose superior - the Chief Special Prosecutor - twice prohibited her from prosecutorial action, was years later sentenced to prison for having independently and lawfully decided to discontinue criminal prosecution, acting within her statutory powers.

Draško Đuranović

Ivona Đokić

1250x600

1084x550

The case of Prosecutor Mitrović: When politics takes over the judiciary

Specijalno državno tužilaštvo podnijelo je optužnicu protiv 13 članova kriminalne grupe Radoja Zvicera, koje terete za stvaranje kriminalne organizacije, više krivičnih djela nedozvoljeno držanje oružja i eksplozivnih materija, zloupotreba službenog položaja, ali i falsifikovanje isprave, prevara i pranje novca.
Specijalno državno tužilaštvo je Specijalnom odjeljenju Višeg suda u Podgorici predalo optužnicu protiv N.V, V.V, G.Č, B.I, O.R, M.K, Ž.V, B.S, I.P, V.V, S.I, M.D. i R.K., zbog krivičnih djela stvaranje kriminalne organizacije, više krivičnih djela nedozvoljeno držanje oružja i eksplozivnih materija, zloupotreba službenog položaja, ali i falsifikovanje isprave, prevara i pranje novca.
Predmet optužnice je osnovana sumnja da su okrivljeni N.V, V.V, G.Č, B.I, O.R, M.K, Ž.V, B.S, I.P, V.V, S.I, M.D,.u 2019. godini, postali članovi kriminalne organizacije koju su organizovali optuženi R.Z. i okrivljeni I.B., čiji su pripadnici postali i optuženi: M.V, R.Ž, A.P, A.Lj, D.K, M.K, S.K, B.R, J.T, N.M, J.M, A.V, S.S. i B.M. i druge nepoznate osobe, sa ciljem da se bavi vršenjem krivičnih djela ubistvo, teško ubistvo i nedozvoljeno držanje oružja i eksplozivnih materija, na teritoriji Crne Gore i drugih država Evrope, radi sticanja nezakonite dobiti i moći, pri čemu je svaki član kriminalne organizacije imao unaprijed određeni zadatak i ulogu.
U optužnici je predloženo da se okrivljenima I.P, Ž.V, M.K. i G.Č. produži pritvor, a da se okrivljenima N.V, V.V, B.I, O.R, B.S. i V.V, koji su u bjekstvu i za kojima su raspisane međunarodne potjernice, sudi u odsustvu.
Prethodno je Specijalno državno tužilaštvo protiv organizatora Zvicera i 14 pripadnika kriminalne organizacije (M.V, R.Ž, A.P, A.Lj, D.K, M.K, S.K, B.R, J.T, N.M, J.M, A.V, S.S. i B.M.) podiglo tri optužnice, zbog krivičnog djela stvaranje kriminalne organizacije i više drugih krivičnih djela, koje su potvrđene i po kojima je u toku glavni pretres pred Višim sudom u Podgorici.
Protiv organizatora I.B. je naredbom Specijalnog državnog tužilaštva određeno sprovođenje istrage i pokrenut krivični postupak, između ostalog i za krivično djelo stvaranje kriminalne organizacije.

Portal ETV

SDT podnijelo optužnicu protiv 13 članova kriminalne grupe Radoja Zvicera

The Centre for Civic Education (CCE) stated that the Special State Prosecutor’s Office (SSPO) „is not demonstrating the necessary seriousness and responsibility“ in cases of particular public interest, which, as they note, deepens suspicions of selective enforcement and the possible untouchability of certain structures.
On November 12th of 2024, the CCE filed a criminal complaint with the SSPO against unknown persons for approving a total of 4,9 million euros for the financing of secondary religious schools in the period from 2019 to 2023, contrary to the General Law on Education and Upbringing. The complaint is based on a report by the State Auditing Institution (SAI), which issued a negative opinion on the legality of these payments and pointed to elements of abuse of office.
The CCE recalls that government conclusions, contracts, and annexes on the basis of which the payments were made cannot be legally valid if they are not in accordance with the law. As they state, the SAI found that the Ministry failed to provide a methodology for calculating education costs, thereby preventing transparent and lawful allocation of budget funds and creating room for corruption risks.
Despite the allegations in the complaint and the findings of the SAI, Special Prosecutor Miroslav Turković issued a decision dismissing the complaint, without providing reasons for such a decision.
The CCE assesses that the prosecution’s conduct was superficial, also pointing to errors in the decision itself. They note that the decision mentions a criminal complaint by the Montenegrin Helsinki Committee, although that organization publicly stated that it had not filed any complaint. They also add that the decision does not specify which CCE complaint it refers to, even though there were several, which makes the use of legal remedies more difficult.
As an additional example of negligence, the CCE points out that the decision incorrectly states the date of the supplement to the complaint as December 28th of 2025 - a date that had not yet occurred at the time the decision was issued.
- All of this indicates a lack of dedication to a case involving multimillion-euro unlawful disposal of state budget funds. At the same time, in other cases of significantly smaller financial value, the prosecution acts much faster and more decisively, which raises the question of the existence of a privileged status for certain entities before the SSPO - the CCE stated.
Due to such conduct by Prosecutor Turković, the organization filed a complaint with the Prosecutorial Council, requesting that it establish the facts and assess the work of the SSPO in this case.
The CCE concludes that unlawful disposal of budget funds represents a serious social threat and that they expect the prosecution to act consistently, transparently, and non-selectively.
- Only in this way can public trust be strengthened and ensure that the prosecution fulfills its role as a protector of the public interest and the rule of law – they stated.

CCE: SSPO’s handling of the case of funding religious schools raises the issue of privileged subjects

I would dismiss the criminal complaint against former senior police official Zoran Lazović and others who were suspected of lifting the entry ban for Serbian nationals Veljko Belivuk and Marko Miljković again - was the response of special prosecutor Sanja Jovićević before the High Court in the proceedings initiated by the Special State Prosecutor’s Office against Lazović, former Chief Special Prosecutor Milivoje Katnić and suspended prosecutor Saša Čađenović.
Prosecutor Jovićević made this statement in response to a question from one of Lazović’s defense attorneys, Zoran Piperović.
Prosecutor Jovićević explained that, based on the factual situation contained in the case files, she would act the same way again - by issuing a decision dismissing the complaint against Lazović and the others.
- I cannot know what additional material might have been in the case file that would have led to a different decision - Jovićević said.
With these statements, she completely dismantled the allegations in the indictment, represented by prosecutor Miloš Šoškić, which accuses Katnić, Lazović, and Čađenović of abuse of official position in favor of the „Kavač“ criminal clan.
Prosecutor Jovićević emphasized that she had thoroughly reasoned her decision to dismiss the complaint, providing a factual and legal assessment that there was no reasonable suspicion that any person had committed the criminal offense alleged. She described whom she had questioned in the case and what actions she had undertaken. She clarified that the criminal complaint against Lazović and the others had been filed by member of parliament Marko Milačić.
In response to a question from attorney Stefan Jovanović, the prosecutor was categorical that no one had contacted her regarding the case, nor had anyone told or suggested what decision she should make.
- Neither in this case nor in any other, neither orally nor in writing, did anyone influence my decision. The then Chief Special Prosecutor Katnić never had any influence in any case - Jovićević stated.
She also said today, in response to attorney Piperović’s question, that a criminal complaint filed against her over her handling of the case had been dismissed.
- The complaint was dismissed by Chief Special Prosecutor Vladimir Novović - Jovićević said while answering Piperović’s questions.
After that, the attorney emphasized that once the criminal complaint against Jovićević had been dismissed, the question arose as to why Zoran Lazović had been indicted.
Jovićević also explained that some documents in the proceedings had been signed by the then Chief Special Prosecutor because she was busy. This was not only the case in that matter, but in some others as well, and exclusively when, due to attendance at hearings, she was unable to do so herself.
- When I issued the decision dismissing the complaint, Milačić filed complaints with the Supreme State Prosecutor’s Office, and those were dismissed - Jovićević said.
She was categorical that Katnić did not request access to the case files relating to the dismissal of the complaint against Zoran Lazović and the others.
She reiterated that there had been no influence in this case or in any other.
In response to attorney Piperović’s question, she denied the allegations from the indictment that he had been in her office with Zoran Lazović ahead of the hearing.
- Attorney Piperović came to my office only once, and that was in connection with proceedings against the Mayor of Ulcinj - the witness said.
The trial continues on January 13th, when the questioning of former deputy director Enis Baković is scheduled.

Jovićević: I would dismiss the complaint against Lazović again, Katnić never influenced my decisions

The hearing at the Special State Prosecutor’s Office (SSPO) confirmed that this is a case of political persecution of critical media and journalists. There is clearly a background to their actions, assessed Editor-in-Chief of Television E Draško Đuranović, who responded this morning to the summons to testify in the investigation against businessman Aleksandar Mijajlović.
Đuranović said that he would take all legal steps to protect his professional and personal integrity.
- We will fight with all legal means. This creates a bad image of the state prosecution. They misused business communication and deliberately targeted six critical media outlets, attempting to criminalize them - Đuranović stated.
He pointed out that representatives of the six media outlets had a meeting with the Ambassador of the European Union (EU) to Montenegro Johan Satler, adding that the United Nations have said they are monitoring these developments.
- We will defend our integrity because we believe this should not be happening in a country that aspires to be a member of the EU – Đuranović said.
We will continue to do our job, he said - and let everyone else do theirs as well.
- It has not been recorded that the SSPO is a lever of power, yet that is today’s Montenegrin reality - he concluded.

Miraš Dušević

Đuranović: The SSPO has confirmed that this is a political persecution of critical media, I will take all legal steps to protect my professional and personal integrity

Saslušanje u Specijalnom državnom tužilaštvu (SDT) je potvrdilo da se radi o političkom progonu kritičkih medija i novinara. Očigledno da postoji pozadina u njihovom postupanju - ocijenio je glavni i odgovorni urednik Televizije E Draško Đuranović koji se jutros odazvao na njihov poziv za svjedočenje u slučaju istrage protiv biznismena Aleksandra Mijajlovića.
Đuranović je poručio da će preduzeti sve pravne radnje za zaštiti svoj poslovni i privatni integritet.
- Borićemo se svim pravnim sredstvima. Ovo stvara lošu sliku o državnom tužilaštvu. Oni su zloupotrijebili poslovnu komunikaciju i svjesno targetirali šest kritičkih medija i pokušali svjesnu kriminalizaciju tih medija - naveo je Đuranović.
Ukazao je da su predstavnici šest medija imali sastanak sa ambasadorom Evropske unije (EU) u Crnoj Gori Johanom Satlerom, te da su Ujedinjene nacije rekle da prate ova dešavanja.
- Branićemo svoj integritet jer mislimo da ovo ne bi trebalo da se dešava u zemlji koja bi trebalo da bude članica EU - decidan je Đuranović.
Nastavljamo, poručuje on, da radimo svoj posao - i neka svako radi svoj posao.
- Nije zabilježeno da je SDT poluga vlasti, a to je danas crnogorska realnost - zaključio je on.

Đuranović: SDT potvrdilo da se radi o političkom progonu kritičkih medija, preduzeću sve pravne radnje da zaštitim svoj poslovni i privatni integritet

Po nalogu Specijalnog državnog tužilaštva, Specijalno policijsko odjeljenje je uhapsilo Milutina Simovića, bivšeg ministra poljoprivrede i ruralnog razvoja u Vladi Crne Gore i protiv njega podnijelo krivičnu prijavu za produženo krivično djelo zloupotreba službenog položaja, saopšteno je iz SDT-a.
- Lice lišeno slobode je saslušano u Specijalnom državnom tužilaštvu kao osumnjičeni, nakon čega mu je određeno zadržavanje, najduže 72 časa od časa lišenja slobode- kazali su iz SDT-a.
Kako ističu, postupak je pokrenut jer postoje osnovi sumnje da je osumnjičeni, u periodu od juna 2017. do avgusta 2020. godine, protivpravno iskorišćavao svoj službeni položaj i ovlašćenja i prekoračio granice svog službenog ovlašćenja i sebi pribavio imovinsku korist, jer je sam ili sa suprugom i drugim članovima porodice ili drugim njemu bliskim licima, boravio u hotelima „Splendid“, u Bečićima, „Bjanka“, u Kolašinu i drugim, odnosno, konzumirao hranu i piće u restoranima „Porto“ i „Imanje Knjaz“ u Podorici, „Izvor“ u Reževićima, „Il Brodetto“, u Pružnu, „Ristorante Life“, „Tartufi &amp; Friends“, „Le Grotte“ u Rimu i drugim, pa i u dane vikenda, a plaćene račune dostavljao blagajni Ministarstva poljoprivrede i ruralnog razvoja i po osnovu njih mu je vršena nadoknada troškova u vidu gotovinskih isplata, iako se očigledno nije radilo o troškovima vezanim za vršenje službene dužnosti.
- U odnosu na navode pojedinih društvenih subjekata da se pokretanjem ovog postupka vrši njihov progon, za ukazati je da je ustavna i zakonska obaveza Specijalnog državnog tužilaštva da preduzme krivično gonjenje u svim slučajevima kada postoje osnovi sumje da je određeno lice učinilo krivično djelo iz njegove stvarne nadležnosti- poručeno je iz Specijalnog državnog tužilaštva,

SDT: Pokrenut postupak protiv Milutina Simovića za produženo krivično djelo zloupotreba službenog položaja

Bivšem ministru poljoprivrede i ruralnog razvoja Milutinu Simoviću određeno je zadržavanje do 72 sata nakon saslušanja u Specijalnom državnom tužilaštvu.
On je uhapšen jutros po nalogu SDT-a.
Njegov branilac, advokat Miroslav Adžić, za Portal ETV je kazao da se Simoviću na teret stavlja zloupotreba službenog položaja, odnosno da je u periodu od 2017. do 2020. godine kao ministar poljoprivrede zloupotrijebio pravo na reprezentaciju.
- Na teret mu se stavlja da je u roku od tri godine u desetak slučajeva zloupotrijebio pravo na reprezentaciju u ukupnom iznosu od oko 5.000 eura, te da je riječ o vise računa u iznosu od &nbsp;100 do oko 500 eura - rekao je Adžić.&nbsp;
Simović je, dodaje advokat, tokom saslusanja pred specijalnom tužiocem Sinisom Milićem iznio svoju odbranu i detaljno objasnio sve čega se mogao sjetiti iz tog perioda, a vezano za krivično djelo koje mu se stavlja na teret.&nbsp;
Advokat Adžić na kraju je dodao da za sada nije poznato da li će tužilac Milić zatražiti od Višeg suda da se Simoviću odredi pritvor.

Simoviću zadržavanje do 72 sata: SDT ga tereti za zloupotrebu "tešku" 5.000 eura

I am appalled that business communication, in which I participated as the Executive Director of Portal Analitika, has even been brought into question or is being attempted to be criminalized and given a context any other than a purely business one - said Tinka Đuranović, who responded to a summons from the Special State Prosecutor’s Office (SSPO) to testify in the investigation against businessman Aleksandar Mijajlović. A hearing of the Editor-in-Chief of Television E Draško Đuranović was also scheduled for today, but it was postponed. The Director of Analitika said she could not provide details of today’s testimony, as the proceedings are ongoing. - I duly responded to the summons to testify and fulfilled my obligation to give testimony - she emphasized. She believes that she is being targeted as a woman in a leading position within a media outlet. - Beyond the fact that I perceive and experience this as an attempt to personally undermine my reputation and endanger my personal livelihood, I believe that this is primarily the targeting of a media outlet and an attempt to influence its reputation, existence, and revenues by presenting business communication as something that is criminalized - Đuranović underlined. She noted that they informed the European Union delegation in Montenegro and addressed the United Nations, adding that the Editor-in-Chief who attended all of those meetings and communications did so precisely in order to protect the journalistic profession. - This is because the Code of Ethics of Journalists in Montenegro is one of the few codes that has been incorporated into law, is explicitly mentioned in legislation, and is relied upon by the Media Law - Đuranović added. She emphasized that the Analitika Portal operates professionally and adheres to the Code of Ethics of Journalists. - And I am here to ensure, in business and financial terms, the conditions for lawful and legitimate operations - Đuranović concluded. <h2>ĐurHe recalled that Television E, as a targeted media outlet, had addressed the delegation of the European Commission.</h2> - The European Commission responded promptly, as did the United Nations, but the story continues. I hope not for much longer, but we will not give up on the professional standards that we uphold - Đuranović said. He does not believe there is any basis for giving testimony about any kind of criminal activity. - If it is a crime to do our job as a media outlet, then we accept that we are, conditionally speaking, on the other side of the law. But I believe it is clear to everyone that this is a form of media targeting, I won't say persecution, but truly an attempt to endanger what is most important for the media - their business and professional reputation - Đuranović concluded.anović: I perceive the SSPO’s actions as pressure, there is no basis for giving testimony about any kind of criminal activity The Editor-in-Chief of Television E Draško Đuranović said that he perceives the actions of the Special State Prosecutor’s Office (SSPO), which summoned him for questioning by phone without a formally delivered subpoena, as pressure and targeting of the media, stating that there is no basis for giving testimony about any criminal acts. Đuranović was contacted by phone on Thursday, December 11th, and asked to give a statement to the Special State Prosecutor’s Office as part of an investigation against businessman Aleksandar Mijajlović, who, according to the SSPO’s order to conduct the investigation, created a network of media outlets to influence socio-political developments. As he pointed out, the summons was not formally delivered to him, but he was informed that the hearing was scheduled for December 19th at 8:30 a.m. - I asked, of course, that the summons be delivered to me in accordance with all legal procedures, especially since I had a trip outside Montenegro for the following week that couldn't be postponed. The summons was not delivered to me, but I was told that the hearing would take place on December 19th at 8:30 a.m. and that I would be questioned as a witness. Unfortunately, that did not happen, so the hearing was postponed by some five or six days - Đuranović said outside the SSPO building. He described this as a form of pressure by the state prosecution, an institution which, he emphasized, should respect both the law and the Constitution. - I don't think this is appropriate - Đuranović stressed.  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/2025121913120_c617daa7b8ffdea8fb1bffd3d1a844400c8f8a0a80c3ec9ff2a7c4727518f9b9.png" data-media-id="editor_0" data-image-id="2025121913120_c617daa7b8ffdea8fb1bffd3d1a844400c8f8a0a80c3ec9ff2a7c4727518f9b9" data-rendition-name="original" width="1920" height="1080" loading="lazy" alt="Draško Đuranović"><figcaption>Draško Đuranović(Photo: Portal ETV)</figcaption></figure>  He recalled that Television E, as a targeted media outlet, had addressed the delegation of the European Commission. - The European Commission responded promptly, as did the United Nations, but the story continues. I hope not for much longer, but we will not give up on the professional standards that we uphold - Đuranović said. He does not believe there is any basis for giving testimony about any kind of criminal activity. - If it is a crime to do our job as a media outlet, then we accept that we are, conditionally speaking, on the other side of the law. But I believe it is clear to everyone that this is a form of media targeting, I won't say persecution, but truly an attempt to endanger what is most important for the media - their business and professional reputation - Đuranović concluded.

Đuranović: I am appalled that business communication is being criminalized, I perceive the SSPO's summons as media targeting

Muškarac je pogođen u nogu u srijedu naveče tokom federalne operacije provođenja imigracionih zakona u sjevernom Mineapolisu, javio je Minesota Star Tribjun (Minnesota Star Tribune).
Prema navodima Star Tribjuna, očevici su rekli da se nakon potjere automobilima u kojoj su učestvovali federalni agenti čula serija pucnjeva.
Zvanične informacije od policijskih agencija nisu odmah bile dostupne, ali je grad Mineapolis na društvenoj mreži Iks (X) saopštio da je "svjestan izvještaja o pucnjavi u kojoj su učestvovali federalni organi za provođenje zakona u sjevernom Mineapolisu".
Izvještaj o pucnjavi pojavio se sedmicu nakon što je agent Američke imigracione i carinske službe (ICE) tokom velike deportacione operacije, koju je u gradu naredio američki predsjednik Donald Tramp, pucao i usmrtio 37-godišnju ženu dok je sjedila za volanom svog automobila u stambenoj četvrti Mineapolisa.
Ubistvo Rene Gud, koja je bila dio dobrovoljne mreže susjedskih patrola koja je pratila i nadzirala aktivnosti ICE-a u gradu, izazvalo je talas protesta u Mineapolisu i širom zemlje.
Ranije u srijedu, Tramp je izjavio da će sljedećeg mjeseca obustaviti savezno finansiranje svakoj saveznoj državi koja ima tzv. "gradove utočišta" (sanctuary cities, engl.), u kojima su vlasti zabranile lokalnoj policiji saradnju s federalnim imigracionim službama.

Novi incident Trampovih agenata: U Mineapolisu upucan muškarac nakon potjere automobilima

U Crnoj Gori jutros je najviše snijega izmjereno na Žabljaku, 38 centimetara (cm), pokazuju podaci objavljeni na sajtu Zavoda za hidrometeorologiju i seizmologiju, prenosi Agencija Mina.
U Rožajama je izmjereno 26 cm snijega, Kolašinu 21, Andrijevici i Beranama po 16, a u Gusinju 14 centimetara.
Visina sniježnog pokrivača u Šavniku je deset cm, Plužinama pet i na Cetinju tri centimetara.

Najviše snijega ima na Žabljaku

U Crnoj Gori u posljednja 24 sata evidentrano je 11 saobraćajnih nezgoda, a osam osoba povrijeđeno je lakše, prenosi Agencija Mina.
Iz Operativno-komunikacionog centra Uprave policije saopšteno je da je u Podgorici evidentirano je sedam nezgoda, a u Baru, Tivtu, Budvi i Nikšiću po jedna.
Izdato je 585 naloga za uplatu novčanih kazni i podnijeto 78 prekršajnih prijava.
Policija je oduzela šest pari registarskih tablica.

Za 24 sata 11 saobraćajnih nezgoda, osam osoba lakše povrijeđeno

Albanski premijer Edi Rama našalio se na račun Grčke i Crne Gore tokom panel-diskusije održane u Ujedinjenim Arapskim Emiratima, objavio je profil Kosovo and Balkans Daily News na društvenoj mreži X.
– Kao Grk, uvijek potcjenjujete druge ljude jer vjerujete da imate monopol nad filozofijom i da ste direktni nasljednici Platona i Aristotela, ali to nijeste – kazao je Rama.
Govoreći o Crnoj Gori, Rama je ironično dodao:
– Crna Gora je najveća i najmoćnija država u regionu. Ima 50 miliona stanovnika. Mi smo mali, ali Crna Gora je ta – rekao je Rama, očigledno aludirajući na preuveličavanje.
<div class="embed-block"><div style="max-width: 550px;"><div style="left: 0; width: 100%; height: 0; position: relative; padding-bottom: 100%;"><iframe src="https://cdn.iframe.ly/api/iframe?app=1&url=https%3A%2F%2Fx.com%2Fkos_data%2Fstatus%2F2011571672168743108&key=87ca3314a9fa775b5c3a7726100694b0" style="top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute; border: 0;" allowfullscreen></iframe></div></div></div>

Tag: specijalno-drzavno-tuzilastvo